Biden’s Slow Progress on Closing Guantánamo

13.6.21

A composite image of President Biden and a tattered US flag at Guantánamo.

Please support my work as a reader-funded journalist! I’m currently trying to raise $2500 (£2000) to support my writing and campaigning on Guantánamo and related issues over the next three months. If you can help, please click on the button below to donate via PayPal.





 

An article last week by NBC News — “Biden quietly moves to start closing Guantánamo ahead of 20th anniversary of 9/11” — was widely shared by opponents of the continued existence of the shameful prison at Guantánamo Bay, but frustratingly failed to live up to the promise of its headline.

40 men are still held at Guantánamo, and nine of these men have been approved for release by high-level US government review processes — three in 2010, two in 2016, one in 2020, and three just last month, in decisions taken by the Periodic Review Boards set up under President Obama that show a willingness on the part of the Biden administration to recognize that there is something fundamentally wrong with a system that continues to hold, indefinitely, men who have been held for up to 19 years, and have never been charged with a crime.

The PRBs reviewed the cases of 64 men under Obama, and approved 38 of them for release, but since then the process of reviewing the other 26 men has largely ossified into rigid threat assessments based on the initial decisions taken under Obama. That has finally changed with the recent decisions to approve three men for release, and it is to be hoped that further recommendations for release will be forthcoming in the PRBs, although none of this will mean anything if these men are not actually freed.

The key to their release requires someone within the Biden administration to take responsibility for prisoner resettlement plans, and the obvious route forward would be to revive the Office of the Special Envoy for Guantánamo Closure, which was set up under Obama but closed under Donald Trump. Last week, just before the NBC News article was published, Secretary of State Antony Blinken told a hearing of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee that the Biden administration was “actively looking” into “recreating the position of a State Department envoy for the closure of the prison,” as Reuters explained. As Blinken stated, “I want to make sure that the department has what it needs both in terms of resources and personnel, and including someone who can focus on this full-time to do that, so we’re actively looking into doing that.”

According to the sources cited by NBC News, however, directly contradicting Secretary Blinken, the administration has “changed course” after “rebuffed attempts to recruit a special envoy.”

Nevertheless, these same sources suggest that the administration “hopes to transfer a handful of the remaining” prisoners — the actual phrase used, unhelpfully, by NBC was “terrorism suspects” —  “to foreign countries,” and then to “persuade Congress to permit the transfer of the rest — including 9/11 suspects — to detention on the US mainland.”

Elsewhere in the article, NBC News repeated claims, reportedly made by “people familiar with the discussions,” that the White House “will first reduce the number of detainees,” but “will put off, at least for now, opening a State Department office and naming an envoy to focus on closing the facility,” even though the release of prisoners is dependant on having someone within the administration to negotiate and oversee their release — the very definition of the Special Envoy for Guantánamo Closure, whose main responsibility, despite the job title, was the resettlement of prisoners approved for release, especially those who cannot safely be returned to their home countries, like the Yemenis, whose repatriation has been repeatedly ruled out by the entire US establishment, for over a decade, because of instability in Yemen.

This contradiction at the heart of the NBC article — and the way it also stands in opposition to Antony Blinken’s recent statement in the House — rather overshadows everything else the sources had to say, although I’ll run through the other aspects of the story just to record what some of the possibilities are.

Of the 40 men still held, 19 have never been charged, and are also part of the PRB process, which has persistently refused to recommend their release, although “a Defense Department official” suggested that they “may be candidates for transfer to foreign countries.” It is to be hoped that this is the case, because, after far too many years in which the entire US establishment has accepted that some of the men still held can continue to be imprisoned indefinitely because of purely administrative assessments of the threat that they allegedly pose, lawmakers and other decision-makers have finally woken up to the fact that, as the prison approaches the 20th anniversary of its opening, in January 2022, it is only acceptable that those still held are either charged or released, as 24 Senators explained in a recent letter to Biden.

The other 12 prisoners — those that have been charged — present another problem for the administration. While two have been “convicted by military commissions,” the ten others — including the five men charged in connection with the 9/11 attacks — are caught up in what appear to be endless pre-trial hearings in the military commission process, established after 9/11, which is fundamentally broken and not fit for purpose.

NBC’s sources suggested that the Biden administration “is likely to try to work out plea deals for the men in the military commissions process, under which they would continue to be detained but could be spared the death penalty,” and “is leaning against including the option of transferring detainees to US military installations” — which Obama tried, but failed to get through Congress. According to the sources, the Biden administration “may, instead, propose that any detainees who are not eligible for transfer to foreign countries be moved to so-called Supermax security prisons on the US mainland, notably the one in Florence, Colorado.”

Even if the sources are correct, however, Biden “must still persuade Congress to permit the transfer of detainees to the mainland,” and NBC suggested that the current administration, like the Obama administration, “plans to use the cost of maintaining Guantánamo, including special care required as detainees age, to try to persuade Congress to reverse the ban on domestic transfers.”

Overall, then, NBC’s article doesn’t really say much that can be counted on — which in part, of course, makes sense because prominently raising Guantánamo as an issue immediately provides a target for Republicans. As “a former senior administration official involved in the discussions” said of Biden officials, “They don’t want it to become a dominant issue that blows up. They don’t want it to become a lightning rod.”

As a result, there is not really any substance to the article’s conclusion that, “At a minimum, people familiar with administration discussions said, the Biden White House hopes to show some progress on closing Guantánamo by the 20th anniversary of 9/11,” especially as, elsewhere, the end of Biden’s four-year term as president is put forward as the date for when he “hopes to close the facility”; in other words, by January 2025.

In the short term, however, despite all the vagueness, there is clearly resonance in the observation that Biden ordering “the withdrawal of all US combat troops from Afghanistan by Sept. 11” has left officials “cognizant of the optics of ending the war while one of its most infamous relics remains.”

For those of us who have demanding the closure of Guantánamo for more years than we care to remember, then, what this article suggests more than anything else is that we can’t just sit back and expect that the administration will move with any urgency to either release prisoners, or to work towards the prison’s closure, and that we must continue to demand its closure in every way we can.

Note: To get involved in the Close Guantánamo campaign’s ongoing photo campaign for the closure of Guantánamo, please take a photo with the latest poster, marking 7,100 days of the prison’s existence on June 19, and send it to the campaign’s email address.

* * * * *

Andy Worthington is a freelance investigative journalist, activist, author, photographer (of an ongoing photo-journalism project, ‘The State of London’), film-maker and singer-songwriter (the lead singer and main songwriter for the London-based band The Four Fathers, whose music is available via Bandcamp). He is the co-founder of the Close Guantánamo campaign (and see the latest photo campaign here) and the successful We Stand With Shaker campaign of 2014-15, and the author of The Guantánamo Files: The Stories of the 774 Detainees in America’s Illegal Prison and of two other books: Stonehenge: Celebration and Subversion and The Battle of the Beanfield. He is also the co-director (with Polly Nash) of the documentary film, “Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo” (available on DVD here, or here for the US, or you can watch it online here, via the production company Spectacle, for £2.55).

In 2017, Andy became very involved in housing issues. He is the narrator of the documentary film, ‘Concrete Soldiers UK’, about the destruction of council estates, and the inspiring resistance of residents, he wrote a song ‘Grenfell’, in the aftermath of the entirely preventable fire in June 2017 that killed over 70 people, and he also set up ‘No Social Cleansing in Lewisham’ as a focal point for resistance to estate destruction and the loss of community space in his home borough in south east London. For two months, from August to October 2018, he was part of the occupation of the Old Tidemill Wildlife Garden in Deptford, to prevent its destruction — and that of 16 structurally sound council flats next door — by Lewisham Council and Peabody. Although the garden was violently evicted by bailiffs on October 29, 2018, and the trees were cut down on February 27, 2019, the resistance continues.

To receive new articles in your inbox, please subscribe to Andy’s RSS feed — and he can also be found on Facebook (and here), Twitter, Flickr and YouTube. Also see the six-part definitive Guantánamo prisoner list, The Complete Guantánamo Files, the definitive Guantánamo habeas list, the full military commissions list, and the chronological list of all Andy’s articles.

Please also consider joining the Close Guantánamo campaign, and, if you appreciate Andy’s work, feel free to make a donation.

8 Responses

  1. Andy Worthington says...

    When I posted this on Facebook, I wrote:

    Here’s my latest article, an analysis of an NBC article last week that suggested that President Biden is “quietly” moving to “start closing Guantanamo ahead of the 20th anniversary of 9/11,” but that didn’t live up to its promise, not least in its suggestion that Biden wants to begin releasing prisoners, but doesn’t yet want to re-establish the role of the Special Envoy for Guantanamo Closure, even though it is impossible to work out how prisoners might be freed without the envoy’s assistance.

    It also contradicts what Secretary of State Antony Blinken told a hearing of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee last week; namely, that the Biden administration is “actively looking” into “recreating the position of a State Department envoy for the closure of the prison,” as Reuters explained.

    I very much hope that Antony Blinken’s position is the more accurate one, as there are nine men at Guantanamo who have been approved for release by high-level government review processes, and every day that they are still held is a failure of justice on the part of the Biden administration.

  2. Andy Worthington says...

    David Barrows wrote:

    It’s so depressing that so many of our politicians in high power are too spiritually hollow to have any real empathy for the men we have tortured and still hold in inexcusably cruel conditions at Guantanamo. We must not turn our back on these victims. If someone is actually culpable, then put him on public trial. Make your case or let them go with real reparations.

  3. Andy Worthington says...

    Very well said, David. Good to hear from you.

  4. Andy Worthington says...

    Asiya Muhammad wrote:

    There also needs to be reparations, compensation and justice for all those so cruely kidnapped, held, tortured and those still being held to ransom even after their release as innocent men.

    Until now some, over a decade later, have been placed in strange countries, no family, no access to their families, no ability to travel to their family, their children and wives, permission denied for their parents and families to visit them.

    No passports, living as stateless people with no nationality and therefore no identity, eternal refugees and most importantly none of those who so brutally destroyed their lives have ever been brought to justice.

  5. Andy Worthington says...

    Thanks for your comments, Asiya. It is undoubtedly true that there need to be reparations and full accountability for the crimes of Guantanamo, and for the appalling siuation whereby former prisoners remained tarred with the taint of Guantanamo, and, especially in the cases of those transferred to third countries, have no proper legally defined status as human beings whatsoever.

    Sadly, I don’t think this process can even begin until Guantanamo is closed, but it’s something that I’m very interested in, and hope to be involved in setting up some kind of accountability project at some point. In the meantime, though, it is crucial that those of us who care about the situation continue to raise it whenever possible.

  6. Ethan Winters says...

    Abd al-Salam al Hilah and Sharqawi Abdu Ali al Haj have been approved for transfer.

    https://www.prs.mil/Portals/60/Documents/ISN1463/SubsequentFullReview2/210608_UPR_ISN1463_SH2_FINAL_DETERMINATION.pdf

    https://www.prs.mil/Portals/60/Documents/ISN1457/SubsequentReview3/210608_UPR_ISN1457_SH2_FINAL_DETERMINATION.pdf

    I’m very surprised that Sharqawi was approved for transfer due to his past comments about wanting to continue to engage in jihad and expressing a desire to fight and kill Americans.

    https://www.prs.mil/Portals/60/Documents/ISN1457/151112_U_ISN_1457_COMPENDIUM_PUBLIC_V1.pdf

    If Sharqawi can be transferred than so should most of the remaining Guantanamo detainees that have not been charged. The only detainees that I doubt would be approved for transfer are the high value detainees and attempted 20th hijacker Mohammed Qahtani. The media would have a field day if Abu Zubaydah, Abu Faraj al-Libi or Qahtani were approved for transfer.

  7. Andy Worthington says...

    Thanks for the news, Ethan. I’ve been watching the PRB page regularly, awaiting updates just like this. I agree that, with Sharqawi approved for release, many others must surely follow, although I think al-Qahtani will be transferred back to Saudi Arabia because of his profound mental health problems, and I have to say that, unless al-Libi and Abu Zubaydah are charged they’ll have to be released too. In Zubaydah’s case, I don’t think the US has a case (although he’s a stateless Palestinian, so it’s going to be hard to find him a new home), but if al-Libi was involved with al-Qaeda then he should be put on trial.

  8. Andy Worthington says...

    For a Spanish translation, via the World Can’t Wait’s Spanish website, see ‘El lento proceso de Biden para cerrar Guantánamo’: http://www.worldcantwait-la.com/worthington-lento-proceso-de-biden-para-cerrar-guantanamo.htm

Leave a Reply

Back to the top

Back to home page

Andy Worthington

Investigative journalist, author, campaigner, commentator and public speaker. Recognized as an authority on Guantánamo and the “war on terror.” Co-founder, Close Guantánamo and We Stand With Shaker. Also, photo-journalist (The State of London), and singer and songwriter (The Four Fathers).
Email Andy Worthington

CD: Love and War

The Four Fathers on Bandcamp

The Guantánamo Files book cover

The Guantánamo Files

The Battle of the Beanfield book cover

The Battle of the Beanfield

Stonehenge: Celebration & Subversion book cover

Stonehenge: Celebration & Subversion

Outside The Law DVD cover

Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo

RSS

Posts & Comments

World Wide Web Consortium

XHTML & CSS

WordPress

Powered by WordPress

Designed by Josh King-Farlow

Please support Andy Worthington, independent journalist:

Archives

In Touch

Follow me on Facebook

Become a fan on Facebook

Subscribe to me on YouTubeSubscribe to me on YouTube

The State of London

The State of London. 16 photos of London

Andy's Flickr photos

Campaigns

Categories

Tag Cloud

Afghans in Guantanamo Al-Qaeda Andy Worthington British prisoners Center for Constitutional Rights CIA torture prisons Close Guantanamo Donald Trump Four Fathers Guantanamo Housing crisis Hunger strikes London Military Commission NHS NHS privatisation Periodic Review Boards Photos President Obama Reprieve Shaker Aamer The Four Fathers Torture UK austerity UK protest US courts Video We Stand With Shaker WikiLeaks Yemenis in Guantanamo