On Guantánamo, No News is Bad News


I wrote the following article for the “Close Guantánamo” website, which I established in January 2012 with US attorney Tom Wilner. Please join us — just an email address is required to be counted amongst those opposed to the ongoing existence of Guantánamo, and to receive updates of our activities by email.

On Guantánamo, the news has largely dried up in recent weeks, which is not reassuring for the 79 men — out of the 149 men still held — who have had their release approved but are still held. 75 of these men were recommended for release in 2009 by President Obama’s Guantánamo Review Task Force, and four others were recommended for release this year by Periodic Review Boards, established to review the cases of the majority of the men who were not cleared for release by the task force.

Since last May, when President Obama promised to resume releasing prisoners — after a period of nearly three years when only five men were released — 17 men have been released, which is obviously progress of sorts. The drought of releases from 2010 to 2013 was because of obstacles raised by Congress and the president’s refusal to use a waiver in the legislation to bypass Congress, but although it is reassuring that 17 men have been freed, the last of those releases was at the end of May, and campaigners for the closure of Guantánamo can be forgiven for wondering when the next prisoner will be released, especially as that last prisoner release — six Taliban leaders in exchange for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, the sole US prisoner of war in Afghanistan — attracted such cynical and hysterical opposition.

According to reports in May, six of the cleared prisoners, from Syria, Palestine and Tunisia — all men who cannot be safely repatriated — were offered new homes in Uruguay after President Mujica responded positively to a request for assistance from the US.

At the start of September, the New York Times reported that the Uruguay deal had been postponed, but a Uruguayan spokesperson responded by stating that the agreement was still on, but no date had yet been set.

It is, of course, hugely disappointing that the release of prisoners to Uruguay has not yet happened, and unfortunately no other countries currently seem to be in line to take in prisoners. The New York Times reported that news of the Uruguay deal had “inspired similar talks with Brazil, Chile and Colombia,” according to regional news reports. In recent weeks, it has been reported that Chile is evaluating a request to accept prisoners, and that the Peruvian government had also been doing the same, but had turned down the request.

As the New York Times also put it, “as many as 14 other releases could also happen by the end of the year if they get approved,” according to officials with knowledge of deliberations, including deals “to repatriate four Afghans and a Mauritanian,” which were completed in March, but have not previously been reported. I mentioned the four Afghans here, and reported the story of the Mauritanian, Ahmed Ould Abdel Aziz, last year.

On September 11, AFP mentioned Aziz in an article noting how “dozens of Guantánamo detainees ought to have sight of freedom, but hard-won deals for their release are languishing awaiting a final Pentagon signature,” essentially because of the obstacles raised by Congress. As AFP also reported, sources within the administration said that “many of the new transfer deals had won a green light from five of the six government agencies involved.” The stumbling block is defense secretary Chuck Hagel, who “has to give final approval to every transfer,” and has been accused of dragging his feet.

Pentagon sources denied that, “saying every case needed proper and thorough review to ensure the right conditions are in place,” and in May Hagel himself explained his reticence.

As I reported recently:

In May, the White House sent Chuck Hagel a memo “saying he should accept more than ‘zero risk’” in approving prisoner transfers “because allowing the prison to remain open raised risks, too.” However, referring to the certification that must be made prior to any prisoner release, Hagel told the Times at the time, “My name is going on that document. That’s a big responsibility.”

In its mention of Ahmed Ould Abdel Aziz, AFP noted how he “is eager to be reunited with his wife, who was pregnant when he was detained, and the young son he has never met,” according to his lawyer, Anna Holland Edwards, who said there are only “so many formative years left and he wants to spend those years with his son,” adding, “He often talks not about living in Guantánamo, but of living in a grave.” She also said that, in addition to his wife and son, there is “an apartment, a job and a social network awaiting Aziz whenever he finally flies back to Mauritania.”

Here at “Close Guantánamo,” we remain convinced that, every day the prison at Guantánamo Bay remains open, it has a corrosive effect on America’s belief that it is a nation that upholds the rule of law, and also continues to create enemies abroad.

Releasing prisoners will not bring this shame and danger to an end on its own; for that, the prison must finally be closed and those accused of crimes tried in an internationally recognized forum, but it remains imperative that men approved for transfer out of the prison are released a soon as possible. Otherwise, it appears that America pretends to have reviews to decide whether to hold or release prisoners, but then fails to let them go if they are approved for release.

What you can do now

Call the White House and ask President Obama to release the Yemenis cleared for release. Call 202-456-1111 or 202-456-1414 or submit a comment online.

Call the Department of Defense and ask Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel to issue certifications for other cleared prisoners: 703-571-3343.

Andy Worthington is a freelance investigative journalist, activist, author, photographer and film-maker. He is the co-founder of the “Close Guantánamo” campaign, and the author of The Guantánamo Files: The Stories of the 774 Detainees in America’s Illegal Prison (published by Pluto Press, distributed by Macmillan in the US, and available from Amazon — click on the following for the US and the UK) and of two other books: Stonehenge: Celebration and Subversion and The Battle of the Beanfield. He is also the co-director (with Polly Nash) of the documentary film, “Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo” (available on DVD here — or here for the US).

To receive new articles in your inbox, please subscribe to Andy’s RSS feed — and he can also be found on Facebook (and here), Twitter, Flickr and YouTube. Also see the six-part definitive Guantánamo prisoner list, and “The Complete Guantánamo Files,” an ongoing, 70-part, million-word series drawing on files released by WikiLeaks in April 2011. Also see the definitive Guantánamo habeas list, the full military commissions list, and the chronological list of all Andy’s articles.

Please also consider joining the “Close Guantánamo” campaign, and, if you appreciate Andy’s work, feel free to make a donation.

9 Responses

  1. Andy Worthington says...

    On Facebook, Iffit Qrshi wrote:

    So tragic

  2. Andy Worthington says...

    Thanks, Iffit, for your comment. Good to hear from you. Such a shame that getting good news about Guantanamo is so difficult.

  3. Andy Worthington says...

    Kathryn Michael wrote:

    Andy now that USA are slowly getting back involved in Iraq and Syria surely releasing prisoners from Guantanamo, even those cleared for release, will not happen. Now more than ever.

  4. Andy Worthington says...

    I think it’s not impossible, Kathryn, as the men in Guantanamo demonstrably have no connection to the ISIS/ISIL people in Iraq and Syria. I think it’s clear that Guantanamo envoy Cliff Sloan, at the State Department, is trying to make arrangements for the release of the 21 men cleared for release who are not Yemenis, many of whom cannot be safely repatriated and need other countries to offer them new homes, and I still think it should be possible for those releases to go ahead. The stumbling block, as ever, is the Yemenis, and while Republicans will claim that the current situation in Iraq and Syria is yet another reason not to release them, the other perceived problem is the current conflict between President Hadi and the Houthi rebels.

  5. Andy Worthington says...

    Zilma L. Nunes wrote:

    Exécution d’Hervé Gourdel: “il aurait fallu ne pas s’engager dans ce conflit”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95gsefrp8Kw
    I’m not sure if you can still thinking in liberation with facts like that happening in the world , it’s lamentable ..the world fear the future. I’m sorry.
    How to deal with a situation like that ?

  6. Andy Worthington says...

    I don’t know, Zilma, but I’m convinced that a new war – raining death from the skies, inadvertently killing many citizens – isn’t the way forward. It’s depressing to me that we’re seeing the same rhetoric, the same media coverage of the West’s bombing campaign now as we did in 2003, when what’s happening now is a direct result of the criminal idiocy of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Blair.

  7. Andy Worthington says...

    Zilma L. Nunes wrote:

    Good luck, Andy..

  8. Andy Worthington says...

    Willy Bach wrote:

    Andy, I have shared this. I understand anyone who no longer knows what to do. It all looks as though the whole process is starting up all over again.

  9. Andy Worthington says...

    Thanks for sharing, Willy. I certainly hope that plans to release prisoners from Guantanamo who have long been cleared for release continue, although I have no doubt that the current situation in the Middle East will impact negatively on efforts to release any of the Yemenis, who make up the majority (58) of the 79 men cleared for release.
    The bigger picture, of course, is profoundly depressing, and, as you say, it is difficult to know what to do when the war drums are pounding again and the same lies we heard back in 2002 and 2003 are being heard again – how the “terrorists” pose a direct threat to our security (remember WMDs, the “sexed-up” dossier and the 45 minute claim, anyone?) and how our actions are legal (experts are saying they are not). We also have the media generally treating it all as a show and a ratings boost and largely failing to ask whether the military propaganda is accurate – and whether, instead of hitting military targets, we’re killing civilians, as we undoubtedly are. In fact, the certainty of our killing citizens is, for me, the main reason we shouldn’t be bombing anyone in the first place.

Leave a Reply



Back to the top

Back to home page

Andy Worthington

Investigative journalist, author, campaigner, commentator and public speaker. Recognized as an authority on Guantánamo and the “war on terror.” Co-founder, Close Guantánamo and We Stand With Shaker. Also, photo-journalist (The State of London), and singer and songwriter (The Four Fathers).
Email Andy Worthington

CD: Love and War

The Four Fathers on Bandcamp

The Guantánamo Files book cover

The Guantánamo Files

The Battle of the Beanfield book cover

The Battle of the Beanfield

Stonehenge: Celebration & Subversion book cover

Stonehenge: Celebration & Subversion

Outside The Law DVD cover

Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo


Posts & Comments

World Wide Web Consortium



Powered by WordPress

Designed by Josh King-Farlow

Please support Andy Worthington, independent journalist:


In Touch

Follow me on Facebook

Become a fan on Facebook

Subscribe to me on YouTubeSubscribe to me on YouTube

The State of London

The State of London. 16 photos of London

Andy's Flickr photos



Tag Cloud

Afghans in Guantanamo Al-Qaeda Andy Worthington British prisoners Center for Constitutional Rights CIA torture prisons Close Guantanamo Donald Trump Four Fathers Guantanamo Housing crisis Hunger strikes London Military Commission NHS NHS privatisation Periodic Review Boards Photos President Obama Reprieve Shaker Aamer The Four Fathers Torture UK austerity UK protest US courts Video We Stand With Shaker WikiLeaks Yemenis in Guantanamo