Fascism in the US, as the Trump Administration Defends Death Squad Executions of US Citizens

Please click on either of the ‘Donate’ or ‘Buy’ buttons below (via PayPal or Stripe) to make a donation towards the $2,500 (£2,000) I’m trying to raise to support my work as a reader-funded investigative journalist, commentator and activist over the next three months. To get links to all my work in your inbox, please also consider taking out a free or paid subscription to my new Substack newsletter.

 

In the space of 17 days, US immigration enforcement agents — members of ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and the Border Patrol — executed two US citizens, in broad daylight, on the streets of Minneapolis, who posed no threat to them.

We know that Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year old mother, and Alex Pretti, a 37-year old ICU nurse with the US Department of Veterans Affairs, were executed, and posed no threat to the agents, because of multiple videos recorded on smartphones at both locations.

Renee Nicole Good, who had just driven her six-year old son to school, was smiling at, and speaking to Jonathan Ross, the agent who executed her, as she began maneuvering her car past him, less than 30 seconds before he shot her, once through her windshield, and twice through the side window, and then called her a “f*cking bitch.”

Alex Pretti, who was monitoring immigration enforcement agents’ actions, as was his right, was filming on his phone, and trying to protect a woman from assault, when he was pepper-sprayed and set upon by officials who, after finding that he was legally carrying a concealed weapon, removed it from him and then, as he was kneeling on the ground, executed him with gunshots to the back of his head. In the space of 30 seconds, he was shot ten times.

In both cases, the agents then prevented medical personnel from assisting either victim, and made no effort to keep the crime scene intact, but what was most astonishing, and unprecedented, was the manner in which senior officials in the administration, including Donald Trump himself, Vice President JD Vance, Stephen Miller, Trump’s Homeland Security Adviser and White House Deputy Chief of Staff, and Kristi Noem, the Director of Homeland Security, immediately rushed to present a version of events, contradicted by the videos, that sought to exonerate the killers, and to blame the victims.

In a deranged rant on social media, Trump claimed that Renee Nicole Good “violently, wilfully, and viciously ran over the ICE officer”, which was patently untrue, adding that he “seems to have shot her in self defense.” He also wrote, ““It is hard to believe he is alive, but is now recovering in a hospital”, even though video footage showed him walking away from the murder scene completely unscathed.

Kristi Noem, meanwhile, called her a “violent rioter” who “weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them”, while both Noem and Stephen Miller called her a “domestic terrorist.”

After the murder of Alex Pretti, in response to critical posts on X by the Minnesota Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar and on the Democratic Party’s account, Stephen Miller went on the offensive in unhinged posts on X, claiming that “A would-be assassin tried to murder federal law enforcement and the official Democrat account sides with the terrorists,” and also calling Pretti a “domestic terrorist” who “tried to assassinate federal law enforcement.”

At a press conference, meanwhile, Kristi Noem falsely claimed that, while “DHS law enforcement was conducting a targeted operation in Minneapolis against an illegal alien wanted for violent assault”, Pretti “approached US Border Patrol officers with a 9mm semi-automatic handgun. The officers attempted to disarm the suspect but the armed suspect violently resisted. Fearing for his life and the lives and safety of fellow officers, an agent fired defensive shots.” She added, gratuitously,  “This violence is directly fueled by hateful rhetoric from Minnesota’s sanctuary politicians. It must end now.”

At another press conference, Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino, leading the actions in Minneapolis, told reporters that the incident “looks like a situation where an individual wanted to do maximum damage and massacre law enforcement,” even though, as Politico noted, “he didn’t provide any evidence for his claim.”

“Your eyes don’t lie”

To some extent, of course, all of this aggressive posturing in the face of the evidence  has backfired. When people are told that they didn’t see what they saw, we’re in 1984-territory, and George Orwell’s establishment of a totalitarian, reality-denying reality, in which, as he described it, “The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”

As Susan Page wrote for USA Today, in a column entitled, “’Your eyes don’t lie.’ Trump, ICE, a death and a turning point”, “In an era of smartphones … people don’t have to believe federal officials or journalists or anyone else. They can watch what happened themselves.” The phrase, “Your eyes don’t lie,” came from Sen. Amy Klobuchar, during an interview on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”

In contrast, however, Trump and his senior officials evidently believe that reality is what they say it is. Through TV appearances, but, in particular, though the immediacy of social media, and the large reach of their accounts — which is, in part, facilitated by the algorithmic manipulations of their Trump-aligned owners — they have completely changed the way the US government operates.

Where once senior officials would generally have been wary of leaping to judgment, aware of the importance of not prejudicing any possible criminal investigations that might have been expected, now the government — very deliberately seeking to sideline both Congress and the courts — rules by social media and, very evidently, has no intention of allowing there to be any kind of investigations at all. Where ICE and the Border Control is concerned, any notion of not rushing to judgment has been erased, because the administration clearly believes that there should be no accountability for their actions under any circumstances.

As JD Vance proclaimed after Renee Nicole Good’s murder, “a federal law enforcement official engaging in federal law enforcement action … is protected by absolute immunity.” That was a complete lie, of course, because immunity only applies when federal officials are “reasonably acting within the bounds of lawful federal duties.”

After uproar from legal experts, Vance has since walked back from his claim, going so far as to suggest that he never said it, but in practice the government has been persistently behaving as though it was true.

Efforts to investigate the circumstances surrounding Good’s death have been repeatedly and deliberately blocked. Federal authorities refused to co-operate with the local authorities, leading the the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) to announce that the agency had “reluctantly withdrawn” from the investigation.

In addition, although the FBI “opened an initial probe into the shooting, and an agent in Minnesota found that ‘sufficient grounds’ existed to open a civil rights probe into Ross, DOJ officials chose not to pursue it”, with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche claiming, “We don’t just go out and investigate every time an officer is forced to defend himself against somebody putting his life in danger. We never do.”

Within the DOJ, four senior officials in the civil division, which investigates police killings, responded to the cover-up by resigning, as did six federal prosecutors in Minnesota, and on January 24 it was reported that Tracee Mergen, the supervisor in the FBI’s Minneapolis field office who had attempted to launch an investigation, had resigned, following pressure from FBI headquarters, run by another obedient and inadequate Trump stooge, Kash Patel.

Similar obstruction is also taking place in connection with Alex Pretti’s murder. DHS officials prevented local police from visiting the scene, even though the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension had secured a warrant signed by a judge ordering them to be allowed access. The judge, Eric Tostrud, also granted a temporary restraining order intended to prevent the DHS from “destroying or altering evidence”, which was an unprecedented move, although, as with Renee Nicole Good’s crime scene, it seems to have come too late to prevent agents from covering their tracks.

How did we get here?

The reason ICE and Border Patrol agents are executing US citizens in broad daylight is because the Trump administration wants to sow terror on the streets of the US mainland, and particularly in locations under Democratic control, both to stifle all dissent, as their Gestapo thugs go about their business, but also because their target is not just immigrants.

Just as Trump targeted DEI (Diversity, Equity and Inclusion) programs when he took office, and initiated anti-“woke” initiatives, the animus of the Trump administration is to silence or erase all opposition to what is, fundamentally, its authoritarian white supremacism; hence, their relentless attacks on “activist judges” in the courts, and their efforts to shut down or take over critical mainstream media — both hallmarks of fascism — and even an effort to portray the entire Democratic Party as “a domestic extremist organization”, as Stephen Miller claimed in August.

Speaking to Sean Hannity on Fox News, Miller said, “The Democrat Party does not fight for, care about, or represent American citizens. It is an entity devoted exclusively [his emphasis] to the defense of hardened criminals, gang-bangers, and illegal, alien killers and terrorists. The Democrat Party is not a political party. It is a domestic extremist organization.”

By doing so, Miller spelled out, pretty explicitly, that everyone on the left, everyone who doesn’t agree with the administration, or refuses to conform to the executive branch’s unconstitutional usurping of all power, is an enemy and will be dealt with accordingly.

Ostensibly, the Trump administration’s fascistic opposition to anyone perceived as an enemy began with immigration, but as Martin Niemöller, the German theologian who opposed the Nazis, may well have said, had he been writing in 2026, “First they came for the undocumented migrants.”

It’s certainly true that Trump’s promise to unleash the largest deportation program in US history, which he sold on the campaign trial, and unleashed on Day One of his presidency, consumed his first weeks in office, and made it appear that it was his primary aim.

It began with a tsunami of executive orders and presidential proclamations, seeking to create the illusion that the US was facing an “invasion”, and declaring a “national emergency” on its southern border; in other words, the illusion that the US was at war, both on its southern border, and internally.

The language used was abominably racist, hysterical and fundamentally untrue. In “Protecting The American People Against Invasion”, Trump claimed that the Biden administration had “invited, administered, and oversaw an unprecedented flood of illegal immigration into the United States”, consisting of “millions of illegal aliens”, many of whom, he alleged, “present significant threats to national security and public safety, committing vile and heinous acts against innocent Americans”, while others “are engaged in hostile activities, including espionage, economic espionage, and preparations for terror-related activities.”

In “Declaring A National Emergency At The Southern Border of the United States”, he claimed that “America’s sovereignty is under attack”, that the southern border “is overrun by cartels, criminal gangs, known terrorists, human traffickers, smugglers, unvetted military-age males from foreign adversaries, and illicit narcotics that harm Americans”, and alleged that “Foreign criminal gangs and cartels have begun seizing control of parts of cities, attacking our most vulnerable citizens, and terrorizing Americans beyond the control of local law enforcement.”

However, the hysteria with which Trump and his pliant dimwit harpies — especially Kristi Noem, her sidekick Tricia McLaughlin, and Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary — smeared everyone as “terrorists”, as ICE and Border Patrol agents began randomly kidnapping and “disappearing” migrants across the country, soon began to unnerve all but his most fanatical base.

What happened, essentially, was that people began noticing that their neighbors, who they knew to be hard-working and law-abiding, were being assaulted and abducted, which seemed rather more significant than whether or not they were strictly undocumented, or were caught up in a maze of byzantine immigration procedures that can last for years, or had been granted opportunities to stay and work in the US under Joe Biden, who had created specific programs in an attempt to practically address a refugee and migrant crisis that was, realistically, impossible to stop.

The gulf between hysteria and reality

Early examples of the gulf between hysteria and reality were the 178 Venezuelans that Trump sent to Guantánamo in February 2025, after he — or his advisors — cynically thought that drawing analogies between the “war on terror” and his own “war on migrants” would reinforce their hysterical allegations about “heinous criminal illegal aliens.”

The plan backfired, however, when the DHS posted photos of the first arrivals, describing them all as “terrorists” and members of the Tren de Aragua gang, and family members, recognizing them, were able to confirm to US journalists that the administration was lying, and that all its claims were, fundamentally, based on randomly rounding up Venezuelans with tattoos, which were foolishly put forward as somehow “proving” gang membership. Within two weeks, all but one of the men were repatriated — although Trump has continued to use Guantánamo to hold migrants from a variety of countries ever since.

Undeterred, Trump then sent more hapless Venezuelans to an extraordinarily brutal mega-Guantánamo in another country, the CECOT prison in El Salvador, but again ran into humiliation when, once more, it was revealed that all their claims about gang membership were largely if not entirely unfounded.

In July, all 252 of the Venezuelans who were “extraordinarily rendered” to CECOT were returned to their home country, as part of a prisoner exchange that involved the release of ten US nationals and permanent residents from Venezuelan prisons, along with around 80 Salvadorian political prisoners.

Perhaps this had been the plan all along, but it seems likely that Bukele had actually been appalled by all the negative publicity that he had become embroiled in because the Trump administration was so fundamentally unconcerned about whether or not the men sent there were gang members or nothing more than hapless refugees or economic migrants who had done nothing more than enter the US illegally in search of work.

When the administration eventually discovered that they were humiliatingly and relentlessly being exposed as liars, they briefly changed tack, focusing on highlighting migrants who, they claimed, had been convicted of crimes — “heinous” crimes, obviously — and working assiduously to send them to third countries, regardless of whether or not their homes countries would have accepted them back.

Initially, this involved arrangements for men to be dumped in South Sudan and Eswatini, although, in July, 36 named men with alleged criminal convictions were sent to Guantánamo, although they were all subsequently removed, mostly, it seems, to their home countries, although the full details are profoundly elusive, because the Trump administration seems to have little or no interest in either transparency or record-keeping.

Stephen Miller’s obsession with target-driven ethnic cleansing

Crucially, however, the malevolent fascistic driver of the deportation program — not Trump himself, but Stephen Miller — has only ever intended the “heinous criminal illegal aliens” rhetoric to provide cover for his real aim, which has always been to ethnically cleanse the US of everyone he regards as subhuman. This means not only every undocumented immigrant, but also any immigrants currently involved in legitimate immigration proceedings, and the 1.3 million immigrants with Temporary Protected Status (primarily from Venezuela, Haiti, El Salvador, Ukraine and Honduras), many of whom have had those protections abolished since Trump returned to the White House a year ago.

In turn, it’s reasonable to expect that Miller, if unchecked, will also seek to deport anyone else he regards similarly — no doubt, naturalized citizens, and even those born in the US.

According to a Washington Post article in April 2025, the “private goal” in high-level discussions in the White House, driven by Miller, and with Trump’s co-operation, was how to deport “one million immigrants a year”, a seemingly unachievable number, far in excess of the record 400,000 that President Obama oversaw.

Miller, however, is obsessed, and in summer, in what was farcically described by Trump as his “big, beautiful bill”, he secured a huge budget increase for immigration enforcement — roughly $170 billion, including, as Joshua Zeitz explained for Politico, “$45 billion for new detention centers and $30 billion to hire 10,000 new ICE officers.” As a result, he noted, “ICE will now become the largest law enforcement agency in the country.”

Zeitz warned, however, that, “as ICE transforms into a massive, un-uniformed, masked domestic army — one that critics fear will have carte blanche to arrest, detain and deport persons without cause or due process, whether they enjoy legal status or not — there’s reason to believe it could backfire.” He added that there was “little denying that mass deportations on the scale that Trump and Miller envision will necessarily require brute displays of force that may shock the public conscience, even among people who theoretically support the broader goals.”

Trump and Miller’s “war” on US cities

At the time, Zeitz was responding to immigration enforcement agents’ violent invasion of Los Angeles, where Trump portrayed resistance as an “existential threat to the country”, and claimed that he needed to “liberate Los Angeles” from a “migrant invasion.”

This was just the first of a number of unprecedented attacks on US cities that, in September, Trump claimed, at a gathering of military leaders in Quantico, Va., constituted “a war”, “a war from within.”

“America is under invasion from within. We’re under invasion from within,” he added, calling the “enemies” he identified as being “no different than a foreign enemy, but more difficult in many ways because they don’t wear uniforms.”

He also said that “defending the homeland” was the military’s “most important priority”, and urged the military leaders to regard US cities as “training grounds.” “They’re very unsafe places”, he added, “and we’re going to straighten them out one by one.”

After San Francisco, invasions were initiated in Washington, D.C., in Memphis, Portland, Or., Chicago and New Orleans, before arriving in Minneapolis in December. Reinforcing the notion that the US was at “war”, the operations were given military names — “Operation Midway Blitz” for Chicago, for example — and, for Portland, Trump sent troops to counter what he called “domestic terrorists” in a “war-ravaged” city, even though this was an entirely fictitious scenario.

A scandal that won’t go away, in large part because of profoundly disturbing conditions in ICE detention facilities

Although other people have been killed in immigration enforcement operations, it’s only in Minneapolis that the outrage has stepped up to become a national and an international scandal.

In part, sadly, this is because both of the victims are white, but it’s also because of cumulative awareness of how fundamentally brutal and inhuman the entire enforcement and deportation process is, not just on the streets of US cities under siege by masked, unaccountable thugs, empowered to execute whoever they want, whenever they want, but also in the violent and fundamentally unaccountable ICE detention facilities across the country — existing facilities that are becoming desperately overcrowded, and new facilities being established via ICE’s unprecedented budget hike.

Credible reports by NGOs, journalists, lawyers and victims of ICE’s increasingly savage and ever-expanding prison system confirm it as a gulag of horrific violence and intimidation, cruel and arbitrary punishment, horrendous overcrowding and the systematic deprivation of basic necessities, including adequate and edible food, water and medical treatment.

Across the entire system, what is also apparent is a very deliberate lack of transparency and accountability, with those held routinely deprived of contact with attorneys, and elected representatives also routinely excluded from making visits.

To cite just a few examples, in December Amnesty International published a devastating report about conditions in two facilities in Florida — Krome (the Krome North Service Processing Center), an existing facility, and “Alligator Alcatraz” (the Everglades Detention Facility), which opened in July last year, particularly condemning the systematic use of “torture and enforced disappearances” at both locations. One Cuban man held at Alligator Alcatraz called it a “copy of Guantánamo”, which appears to be no exaggeration, as these facilities represent the violent and lawless injustices of “war on terror” brought to the US mainland.

Also in December, the ACLU and other NGOs highlighted horrendous conditions at Camp East Montana, on the Fort Bliss military base in El Paso, Texas, a new $1.2 billion facility intended to hold up to 5,000 “detainees”, which is located on the site of a former WWII Japanese-American internment camp. As with the facilities in Florida, food is inadequate (or worse), outbreaks of raw sewage are widespread, conditions are cramped, with, often, no opportunities for outside recreation, the provision of medical care is alarmingly poor, and arbitrary and often severe violence is widespread.

As in Florida, too, those held are regularly pressurized into accepting deportation without being allowed to exercise any of their rights. Although many are resisting the pressure, it is unknown how many of those held have already “disappeared”, as is the case with “Alligator Alcatraz”, where, in September, the Miami Herald reported that it had been unable to locate “the whereabouts of two-thirds of more than 1,800 men detained” there in July. In some cases, this may have been because, as a state-run facility, the prison’s authorities are not obliged to use ICE’s database, but it’s impossible to know, because Florida doesn’t have a system for finding out who is in custody, meaning that they may well have been “disappeared’ without trace.

As well as exposing horrendous conditions in these and other facilities, and the alarming prevalence of extra-legal “disappearances”, reporters have also been uncovering a shocking death toll in ICE’s prisons — 32 known deaths in 2025, the highest rate since 2004, shortly after the Department of Homeland Security and ICE were established in the wave of paranoia and authoritarianism that followed the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

Profiles of these 32 victims of ICE’s homicidal brutality were included in a comprehensive report published by the Guardian on January 4, which stated, “They died of seizure and heart failure, stroke, respiratory failure, tuberculosis or suicide. Some died at ICE detention centers and field offices, others after they had been transferred to hospitals, but were still under ICE custody. In some cases, their families and lawyers have alleged, they died of neglect, after repeatedly trying and failing to get medical care.” In some cases too, it should be noted, those who died may well have been murdered.

The Guardian also explained how those who died rarely fitted the government’s hysterical rhetoric about “heinous criminal illegal aliens.” As the article stated, “Some of those who died in detention had arrived in the US recently, seeking asylum. Others had arrived years ago, some as young children. Some had been apprehended on criminal charges or had served time for convictions; others had been picked up in the administration’s indiscriminate ICE raids.”

ICE’s facilities are clearly out of control. As Mike Ludwig reported for Truthout on January 17, “The number of people imprisoned by ICE increased by 75 percent to nearly 66,000 in 2025, and despite repeated claims by administration officials about targeting ‘the worst of the worst’, nearly 74 percent have no criminal convictions, according to the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse immigration database. ICE’s ‘roving patrols’ and ‘indiscriminate raids’ have contributed to a 2,450 percent increase in the number of people with no criminal record held in ICE detention on any given day, according to the American Immigration Council.”

Setareh Ghandehari, advocacy director at the Detention Watch Network, told Truthout that “ICE is now operating nearly 200 jails nationwide after opening or reopening more than 130 facilities in 2025”, and, in its Fort Worth report, the ACLU noted that new detention sites were opening every few weeks, and anticipated that Fort Dix in New Jersey would be “the next military site the Trump administration will use for mass immigration detention”, also noting “reports of ICE scouting a Coast Guard base in New York.”

This needs to end

Clearly, what needs to happen now is for the entire mass deportation program to be abandoned, but that seems unlikely given Donald Trump’s deep-seated and fundamentally implacable racism. However, Trump is also a survivor, and has already begun to distance himself from the outrageous lies about ICE’s open-air executions that he himself played a major part in promoting.

It seems that Gregory Bovino has been chosen as a sacrifice, banished from Minneapolis as Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, takes his place. Calls are also mounting for Kristi Noem to be sacked, although, at present, Trump is defending her.

In truth, however, no significant change to the deportation program can happen unless Stephen Miller is removed from his job. As Greg Sargent explained in a forensic condemnation of Miller’s ugly philosophy for the New Republic last month, while MIller regards immigrants as a threat to white “civilization” — “If you import the Third World, you become the Third World” being a key quote of his as Trump’s presidential campaign got underway in 2024 — his mass deportation plans ignore the overwhelming extent to which immigrants assimilate, and they are also economically insane, because an aging population needs more, not less immigration, and the economy will tank otherwise.

As Sargent stated, however, “Miller’s alternative is a horror. He has set in motion a vicious math problem: His deportation machinery is arresting people faster than they are being removed. To hold them, he’s now looking to build out a network of vast warehouses. We’re going to end up with a massively expanded immigrant carceral state at an enormous cost to all of us, both in taxpayer dollars and in the searing social conflict that Miller’s masked storm troopers have unleashed on the streets of US cities.”

Greg Sargent wrote these words before the executions of Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti, which have only emphasized how disturbing the descent into fascism, led by Trump and Miller, is in reality — death squads on the streets, and proliferating torture prisons from which there is no way out for increasing numbers of immigrants who have never committed a crime.

Polls consistently show that the majority of Americans, while welcoming efforts to remove violent criminals, have no interest in targeting hard-working, law-abiding immigrants for whom, instead, paths should be sought to establish their legal status. In polling unveiled on Friday by the New York Times and Siena University, “61 percent of respondents said ICE’s tactics had gone too far, compared with 26 percent who said they were ‘about right’ and 11 percent who believed they did not go far enough.”

Meanwhile, a new YouGov poll found that “46 percent of Americans somewhat or strongly support abolishing ICE, more than the 41 percent who somewhat or strongly oppose getting rid of the agency.”

Will it be enough for the tide to turn?

* * * * *

Andy Worthington is a freelance investigative journalist, activist, author, photographer (of a photo-journalism project, ‘The State of London’, which ran from 2012 to 2023), film-maker and singer-songwriter (the lead singer and main songwriter for the London-based band The Four Fathers, whose music is available via Bandcamp). He is the co-founder of the Close Guantánamo campaign (see the ongoing photo campaign here) and the successful We Stand With Shaker campaign of 2014-15, and the author of The Guantánamo Files: The Stories of the 774 Detainees in America’s Illegal Prison and of two other books: Stonehenge: Celebration and Subversion and The Battle of the Beanfield. He is also the co-director (with Polly Nash) of the documentary film, “Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo”, which you can watch on YouTube here.

In 2017, Andy became very involved in housing issues. He is the narrator of the documentary film, ‘Concrete Soldiers UK’, about the destruction of council estates, and the inspiring resistance of residents, he wrote a song ‘Grenfell’, in the aftermath of the entirely preventable fire in June 2017 that killed over 70 people, and, in 2018, he was part of the occupation of the Old Tidemill Wildlife Garden in Deptford, to try to prevent its destruction — and that of 16 structurally sound council flats next door — by Lewisham Council and Peabody.

Since 2019, Andy has become increasingly involved in environmental activism, recognizing that climate change poses an unprecedented threat to life on earth, and that the window for change — requiring a severe reduction in the emission of all greenhouse gases, and the dismantling of our suicidal global capitalist system — is rapidly shrinking, as tipping points are reached that are occurring much quicker than even pessimistic climate scientists expected. You can read his articles about the climate crisis here. He has also, since, October 2023, been sickened and appalled by Israel’s genocide in Gaza, and you can read his detailed coverage here.

To receive new articles in your inbox, please subscribe to Andy’s new Substack account, set up in November 2024, where he’ll be sending out a weekly newsletter, or his RSS feed — and he can also be found on Facebook (and here), Twitter and YouTube. Also see the six-part definitive Guantánamo prisoner list, The Complete Guantánamo Files, the definitive Guantánamo habeas list, and the full military commissions list.

Please also consider joining the Close Guantánamo campaign, and, if you appreciate Andy’s work, feel free to make a donation via PayPal or via Stripe.