UK Torture: Ex-Guantánamo Prisoner’s Memories Provide A Reminder That We Need Accountability

24.7.18

Protestors with Witness Against Torture calling for the closure of Guantanamo and accountability for torture outside the White House on January 11, 2015 (Photo: Andy Worthington).Please support my work as a reader-funded journalist! I’m currently trying to raise $2500 (£2000) to support my writing and campaigning on Guantánamo and related issues over the next three months of the Trump administration.

 

How short memories are in this goldfish world of ours. Less than a month ago, Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) issued two reports, one on ‘Detainee Mistreatment and Rendition: 2001–2010’ and the other on ‘Detainee Mistreatment and Rendition: Current Issues.’

On Facebook, I commended Dominic Grieve MP for his stewardship of the ISC, and for having spent years trying to uncover the truth about Britain’s involvement in post-9/11 rendition and torture, inspired, I have no doubt, by the US’s demonstration of checks and balances in its own political system, with the Senate Intelligence Committee’s 6,200-page report, of which the 528-page executive summary was issued in December 2014, providing a permanent reminder that, in contrast, the UK tends to prefer an all-encompassing blanket of “official secrecy” regarding its own wrong-doing.

I wrote of the ISC’s reports, “This is compelling stuff, and a testament to Grieve’s determination to go beyond previous whitewashes, but what is clearly needed now is an official judge-led inquiry which will leave no stone unturned — and no senior ex-officials (up to and including Tony Blair and Jack Straw) unquestioned. Grieve noted that the committee was ‘denied access to key intelligence individuals by the prime minister’ (Theresa May) and so ‘reluctantly decided to bring the inquiry to a premature end.’”

I was away for a week just after the reports were issued, and so had no time to write any more about them, but the Guardian’s main article, which I linked to, provided a good summary — an unsurprising outcome, given that the co-author of the article was Ian Cobain, the mainstream media’s most tenacious investigator of British torture since 9/11. Cobain also produced a list of key findings, as follows:

• On 232 occasions UK intelligence officers were found to have continued supplying questions to foreign agencies between 2001 and 2010, despite knowing or suspecting a prisoner was being tortured or mistreated.

• On 198 occasions, UK intelligence officers received information from a prisoner they knew was being mistreated.

• In a further 128 cases, foreign intelligence bodies told UK intelligence agencies prisoners were being mistreated.

• MI5 or MI6 offered to help fund at least three rendition operations.

• The agencies planned or agreed to a further 28 rendition operations.

• They provided intelligence to assist with a further 22 rendition operations.

• Two MI6 officers consented to mistreatment meted out by others. Only one of these incidents has been investigated by police.

• In a further 13 cases, UK intelligence officers witnessed an individual being tortured or mistreated.

• MI5, MI6 and the military conducted up to 3,000 interviews of prisoners held at Guantánamo.

• No attempt is being made to find out whether guidelines introduced by the coalition government in 2010 are helping to prevent the UK’s intelligence agencies from continuing to be involved in human rights abuses.

• The UK breached its commitment to the international prohibition of torture, cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.

• On at least two occasions ministers made “inappropriate” decisions.

• Jack Straw authorised payment of “a large share of the costs” of the rendition of two people in October 2004. 

• A further Scotland Yard investigation must be considered.

Even before the reports were published, the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Extraordinary Rendition, led by Ken Clarke, had called for what the Guardian described as “a judge-led inquiry into the UK’s role in human rights abuses since September 11 [2001],” denouncing what they called “Britain’s disgraceful involvement in rendition and torture”, and explaining that “this was the only way to establish the truth about who was responsible for abuses.”

These calls for a judge-led inquiry only increased after the reports were issued, prompting Foreign Office minister Alan Duncan to tell MPs on July 2 that the government would “give ‘careful consideration’ to calls for a renewed judge-led inquiry,” following up on an earlier inquiry, launched in 2010, that had fizzled out when NGOs refused to take part in it because of its profound limitations. Duncan added that the government “would give its decision on a judicial inquiry within 60 days.”

This took place while I was still away, and just a few days later, on US Independence Day, I was glad to see that ten former Guantánamo prisoners — Moazzam Begg, Shaker Aamer, Asif Iqbal, Jamil El-Banna, Ruhal Ahmed, Bisher al-Rawi, Binyam Mohamed, Shafiq Rasul, Omar Deghayes and Tarek Dergoul — had a letter published in the Guardian in which they wrote, “We, the former British nationals and residents who were imprisoned by the US government at secret prisons in Kandahar, Bagram and Guantánamo, call on the British government to order a comprehensive and transparent judge-led public inquiry into the perpetrators of this abuse, and the individuals who ordered it.”

As they proceeded to explain:

Despite its limitations, the report confirms everything we have been saying over the course of almost two decades: that British intelligence services were wilfully complicit in our kidnap, false imprisonment, torture and other mistreatment.

The statistics revealed in the ISC report have astounded even us but we know that this is the tip of the iceberg.

We are, however, painfully aware that reports and inquiries of the government by the government into its own abuses have not resulted in justice. For example, the US Senate published a report in 2014 that admitted CIA agents had extraordinarily renditioned and tortured 119 prisoners during the course of the “war on terror”. Despite admitting these war crimes, no prosecutions against the perpetrators have ever taken place.

On the contrary, since then the US has elected a president who believes that “torture works” and who has appointed someone who ran a torture facility to head the CIA, despite reports alleging she ordered the destruction of evidence documenting torture. He has also signed an executive order to keep Guantánamo open. Therefore, there must be meaningful accountability in the very highest corridors of power to ensure that such crimes never recur.

Between us, we have spent close to 90 years imprisoned without charge or trial. We have endured cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. However, we really do want to put this episode behind us.

We were pleased to learn about the prime minister’s recent apology given to Libyan torture survivors Abdel Hakim Belhaj and Fatima Boudchar [who had been rendered to torture in Libya with British support]. It is now time that we, citizens and residents of this country, also receive a long overdue apology and see the perpetrators of our abuse brought to account.

That was three weeks ago, and since then a silence has descended, which can only encourage a kind of amnesia, and so I was surprised and delighted on Friday when the Metro, London’s Daily Mail-produced free newspaper, published an article by former Guantánamo prisoner Younus Chekkouri, a Moroccan citizen who was finally released from Guantánamo in 2015, and whose story I had followed for many years, as he was a transparently peace-loving individual who, nevertheless, had been absurdly regarded as a terrorist for years before the authorities realized that they had been profoundly mistaken.

As well as recalling his abuse at the hands of his US captors, Chekkouri also wrote about how British agents interrogated him in Afghanistan and at Guantánamo — a vivid reminder of how the British (and, it should be mentioned in passing, many other countries) willingly engaged in interrogations in the “war on terror,” even though it was obvious that the context in which those interrogations took place was dangerously lawless, and, as well as abusing their own citizens and residents, also queued up to interrogate the citizens of other countries who had no obvious connection to their countries whatsoever.

I’m cross-posting Younus Chekkouri’s article below, and I hope it provides a timely reminder of British and American complicity in torture and abuse — and, in addition, how some victims of that torture and abuse — like Abu Zubaydah, for example — are still held at Guantánamo, a place founded on torture for which there is no justification whatsoever for its ongoing existence.

After 13 years in Guantánamo, tortured for a crime I didn’t commit, I will never be free from suffering
By Younus Chekkouri, Metro, Friday 20 Jul 2018

I knew many torturers in the 13 years the US held me prisoner. There was Ana – at least that is what she called herself – the American interrogator at Guantánamo who often threatened to have me hanged.

I still see her in my nightmares.

Then there were the camp’s guards, who beat me with their shoes, and laughed when I asked for looser clothing because the pain was so great. They said they would give it to me if I confessed to being a member of Al Qaeda, but I could not, because I know nothing of terrorism.

My ex-wife and I were in Afghanistan from Morocco, looking for work with a foreign aid organisation, when US forces invaded in 2002.

We fled the war into Pakistan, where we were captured by local security forces, accused of being foreign fighters, and sold to the US military for a $5,000 (£3,800) bounty. I later came to understand that this happened to hundreds of other unfortunate men.

I will never forget my first torturers – who can forget the first time?

The Americans placed a bag over my head and beat me mercilessly, again and again. An Afghan guard in their employ put a pistol to my head and threatened to pull the trigger. This was at Kandahar, in an airport that had been turned into a prison camp.

Not all of my tormentors were American, though.

One night, after about two months at the prison, I was woken in the middle of the night. The guards handcuffed me, dragged me from my cell, and began punching me, in my face and all over my body.

By the time I reached the interrogation room my clothes were torn and I was shaking, with fear and anger.

The two men waiting for me there were dressed in civilian clothes. They spoke in Egyptian Arabic dialect, fluently. They threatened to send me back to Morocco to be tortured. When I tried to explain there had been a terrible mistake, they mocked me. ‘Ya salam,’ one of them kept saying, sarcastically. ‘Oh really?’

I suspect they were British because they showed me pictures of Moroccans and other North Africans living in Britain. There were hundreds of pictures, of men and women, and endless questions – about the British citizens held prisoner at the camp, and about places I had never been and people I had never met. After that night, they interrogated me twice more before I was flown to Guantánamo.

Now I read that the British parliament has published a report, documenting what I and many other victims of the US’s torture and rendition programme know to be true: that British spies witnessed prisoners being tortured, submitted questions when they knew ‘enhanced interrogation’ meant torture, and received intelligence resulting from torture.

I find this easy to believe, because I experienced it myself. I was interrogated twice more by British agents, at Guantánamo. What I find hard to believe is that a country founded on the rule of law, a country that likes to claim moral leadership, can tolerate not knowing what abuses were committed in its name.

Am I in the report? It is incomplete, and cloaked in code words, so there is no sure way of telling. But I know my torture and interrogation really happened.

They are the stuff of nightmares now, but the pain and fear and humiliation were real.

Three years ago, the Americans released me from Guantánamo.

They never charged me with a crime, never apologised, never even tried to explain how I ended up there. They just washed their hands of me.

Now, although I am a free man, I often can’t sleep, I take anxiety pills every day, and my body aches, reminding me of the beatings.

I will never be free of suffering.

Slowly, I am rebuilding my life in Morocco. I won my legal case, remarried and have a baby daughter.

But I still see Ana’s face, and still hear that mocking voice, taunting me, with very British sarcasm: ‘Ya salam.’

Andy Worthington is a freelance investigative journalist, activist, author, photographer, film-maker and singer-songwriter (the lead singer and main songwriter for the London-based band The Four Fathers, whose music is available via Bandcamp). He is the co-founder of the Close Guantánamo campaign (and see the latest photo campaign here) and the successful We Stand With Shaker campaign of 2014-15, and the author of The Guantánamo Files: The Stories of the 774 Detainees in America’s Illegal Prison (click on the following for Amazon in the US and the UK) and of two other books: Stonehenge: Celebration and Subversion and The Battle of the Beanfield. He is also the co-director (with Polly Nash) of the documentary film, “Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo” (available on DVD here — or here for the US), and for his photo project ‘The State of London’ he publishes a photo a day from six years of bike rides around the 120 postcodes of the capital.

In 2017, Andy became very involved in housing issues. He is the narrator of a new documentary film, ‘Concrete Soldiers UK’, about the destruction of council estates, and the inspiring resistance of residents, he wrote a song ‘Grenfell’, in the aftermath of the entirely preventable fire in June that killed over 70 people, and he also set up ‘No Social Cleansing in Lewisham’ as a focal point for resistance to estate destruction and the loss of community space in his home borough in south east London.

To receive new articles in your inbox, please subscribe to Andy’s RSS feed — and he can also be found on Facebook (and here), Twitter, Flickr and YouTube. Also see the six-part definitive Guantánamo prisoner list, The Complete Guantánamo Files, the definitive Guantánamo habeas list, the full military commissions list, and the chronological list of all Andy’s articles.

Please also consider joining the Close Guantánamo campaign, and, if you appreciate Andy’s work, feel free to make a donation.

14 Responses

  1. Andy Worthington says...

    When I posted this on Facebook, I wrote:

    Here’s my latest article, in which I cross-post a recent article by former Guantanamo prisoner Younus Chekkouri, a Moroccan citizen released from Guantanamo in 2015, who, as well as recalling his torture by US personnel, also writes about how, in Afghanistan and at Guantanamo, he was interrogated by British agents as well. It’s a reminder of the revelations a month ago in the British government’s Intelligence and Security Committee’s two reports about post-9/11 ‘Detainee Treatment and Rendition’, the most comprehensive effort to date to investigate British complicity in torture, for which we owe a debt to the tenacity of the ISC’s chair, the Tory MP and former Attorney General Dominic Grieve (who, incidentally, is also one of the most prominent voices of sanity in the Tory Party regarding the need to avoid a hard Brexit). The government has promised to respond to calls for a judge-led inquiry into British complicity in torture by the start of September, so let’s see if anything comes of that. I hope so, but I’m not holding my breath.

  2. Andy Worthington says...

    Thanks to everyone taking an interest in this. Since yesterday, of course, the focus of attention when it comes to Britain and counter-terrorism is of course our new home secretary Sajid Javid’s outrageous decision to let the US have Alexanda Kotey and El Shafee Elsheikh, the two ISIS butchers known, incongruously, as the ISIS Beatles.
    The first shocking aspect of this story precedes Javid’s recent appointment, and is the stripping of British citizenship from the two men. Stripping the British citizenship of dual nationals became a frequent occurrence when Theresa May was home secretary, but in Alexanda Kotey’s case it seems that he wasn’t a dual national, and is now stateless. If this is the case, it’s a genuinely alarming development.
    Turning to their proposed transfer to the US to face a trial, the uproar is because Javid apparently doesn’t care that they will face the death penalty. As Gaby Hinsliff noted in the Guardian, “The Sun is probably right to argue that most people would happily see them dead. But for ‘string ‘em up, for all we care’ to become the effective position of the British government is a genuinely shocking moment all the same. There was no discussion, no debate in parliament. MPs only found out from the newspapers that the home secretary, Sajid Javid, had upended the settled view of successive governments by declining to seek American assurances that the death penalty would not be invoked before co-operating with attempts to put them on trial in the US.”
    See: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jul/24/death-penalty-sajid-javid-isis-beatles

  3. Andy Worthington says...

    Here’s a Middle East Eye article from March that looks in detail at the citizenship-stripping issues relating to Alexanda Kotey and El Shafee Elsheikh: http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/members-says-illegal-removal-uk-citizenship-harms-fair-trial-249871592

  4. Andy Worthington says...

    Brigid Mary Oates wrote:

    Thank you Andy x

  5. Andy Worthington says...

    You’re welcome, as ever, Brigid.

  6. Andy Worthington says...

    Rick Triangle wrote:

    So much like #AmeriKKKa now. The stripping of Citizenship and Residency is now a regular occurrence, Monday through Friday, 52 weeks a year. Thank you for your article, Andy Worthington, and thank you for CARING. Perhaps 1 day we can meet in a better time and speak of these abominable government actions in the Past. I Hope So. 😉

  7. Andy Worthington says...

    So do I, Rick. We are on so many slippery slopes right now. The stripping of citizenship is just one problem, but making citizens stateless is a profound and deeply troubling insult to the essential notion that citizenship is inviolable, and that the law and the courts are there to punish anyone who does anything wrong.

  8. Andy Worthington says...

    Aleksey Penskiy wrote:

    Thanks for your work, Andy.

  9. Andy Worthington says...

    Thank you. And thanks for your interest, Aleksey.

  10. Tom says...

    They’re convinced that nobody will ever touch them. It’s customary to never prosecute anyone from the previous administration. If we prosecute anyone in intelligence, we’re seen as “weak on terrorism”. They’ll never allow that to happen.

  11. Andy Worthington says...

    Yes, I think that’s how it works, Tom, sadly, but we use keep pushing for more. Without pressure, we wouldn’t have had the Senate torture report or these reports from the UK. Everything would have been buried.

  12. asad says...

    Experiences and autobiographies of ex ISI and MI officers of Pakistan Army … just have a look at it at telegram channel @combspk

  13. Tom says...

    Will Guantanamo be brought up in the mid term elections in November? They should be. But the Republicans would never allow it and the Democrats are terrified that any criticism equals being “soft on terrorism”.

  14. Andy Worthington says...

    Guantanamo is largely forgotten, Tom. Sadly, I suspect that neither party will find any reason to mention it.

Leave a Reply

Back to the top

Back to home page

Andy Worthington

Investigative journalist, author, campaigner, commentator and public speaker. Recognized as an authority on Guantánamo and the “war on terror.” Co-founder, Close Guantánamo, co-director, We Stand With Shaker. Also, singer and songwriter (The Four Fathers) and photographer.
Email Andy Worthington

CD: Love and War

Love and War by The Four Fathers

The Guantánamo Files book cover

The Guantánamo Files

The Battle of the Beanfield book cover

The Battle of the Beanfield

Stonehenge: Celebration & Subversion book cover

Stonehenge: Celebration & Subversion

Outside The Law DVD cover

Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo

RSS

Posts & Comments

World Wide Web Consortium

XHTML & CSS

WordPress

Powered by WordPress

Designed by Josh King-Farlow

Please support Andy Worthington, independent journalist:

Archives

In Touch

Follow me on Facebook

Become a fan on Facebook

Subscribe to me on YouTubeSubscribe to me on YouTube

Andy's Flickr photos

Campaigns

Categories

Tag Cloud

Afghans in Guantanamo Al-Qaeda Andy Worthington British prisoners CIA torture prisons Close Guantanamo David Cameron Donald Trump Four Fathers Guantanamo Housing crisis Hunger strikes London Military Commission NHS NHS privatisation Periodic Review Boards Photos President Obama Reprieve Shaker Aamer The Four Fathers Torture UK austerity UK protest US courts Video We Stand With Shaker WikiLeaks Yemenis in Guantanamo