Abdul Latif Nasser’s Story: Imagine Being Told You Were Leaving Guantánamo, But Then Donald Trump Became President

15.8.18

A recent photo of Guantanamo prisoner Abdul Latif Nasser, as taken by representatives of the International Committee of the Red Cross, and made available to his family.Please support my work as a reader-funded journalist! I’m currently trying to raise $2500 (£2000) to support my writing and campaigning on Guantánamo and related issues over the next three months of the Trump administration.




 

I wrote the following article for the “Close Guantánamo” website, which I established in January 2012, on the 10th anniversary of the opening of Guantánamo, with the US attorney Tom Wilner. Please join us — just an email address is required to be counted amongst those opposed to the ongoing existence of Guantánamo, and to receive updates of our activities by email.

“Close Guantánamo” has recently been on vacation, a short break punctured only by the latest episode in our ongoing photo campaign — 6,050 days of the prison’s existence, on August 4, and photos marking this latest bleak anniversary, featuring opponents of the prison’s continued existence.

Donald Trump doesn’t care, of course. While the president who set up Guantánamo (George W. Bush) eventually conceded it had been a mistake, and while his successor (Barack Obama) said he would close it but didn’t, Trump is an enthusiast for keeping it open, seems to care nothing about the law, would reintroduce torture and send new prisoners to Guantánamo if he could, and clearly has no intention of releasing anyone from the prison at all, even though five of the 40 men still held were approved for release by high-level government review processes under President Obama.

Three of the five had their release approved by the Guantánamo Review Task Force that Obama set up shortly after first taking office in 2009 to advise him on what to do with the 240 men he had inherited from George W. Bush (he was recommended to release 156 men, to try 36 and to continue to hold 48 without charge or trial), and two had their release approved by the Periodic Review Boards that subsequently reviewed the cases of 64 prisoners from the latter two categories from 2013 to 2016 on a parole-type basis.

38 of those 64 men had their releases recommended, and all but two were freed before Obama left office. I wrote about these two men left behind, Abdul Latif Nasser, a Moroccan, and Sufyian Barhoumi, and Algerian, as well as the three men approved for release in 2009, in an article for Al-Jazeera last June, but I was delighted when, last week, Jessica Schulberg, who covers foreign policy and national security for the Huffington Post, revisited Abdul Latif Nasser’s story, telling it in much greater detail than I had been able to, and, I hope, getting it out to a wide audience. 

Nasser’s story certainly deserves to be heard as much as possible, because he and the other prisoners approved for release are, very specifically, prisoners of Donald Trump.

In her article, Schulberg runs through Nasser’s story via his lawyers at the human right organization Reprieve, and via his family, who, to the best of my knowledge, have not been heard from before. His wonderfully supportive family reveal a man who would not pose any threat to the US if released, but then the US authorities already know that, having approved him for release in his PRB for exactly that reason. 

Donald Trump, however, has no interest in what was decided on a conscientious and thorough basis by government representatives under Obama, and can do so because no legally enforceable power underpins the Guantánamo review processes.

While the focus of campaigners’ passion and ire needs to be focused relentlessly on Trump, who has shut down the office of the envoy for Guantánamo Closure, which not only helped in arranging prisoners’ transfers, but also, crucially, monitored them after release, Schulberg’s article also, justifiably, pulls no punches in criticizing Obama.

The criticism of Obama focuses particularly on the way that his Justice Department blocked emergency efforts to get Nasser (and Sufyian Barhoumi, the other prisoner still held who was approved for release by a PRB) released just before Trump took office, when, as Wells Dixon of the Center for Constitutional Rights, representing Barhoumi, explained, “The president said all of the right things … but his administration — and he, himself, as commander in chief — were unwilling to take the necessary steps to achieve closure. And in fact, when it came to [the emergency motion], they took steps that were contrary to the stated desire to close the prison.”

Tellingly, a spokesperson for Obama refused to respond when asked about this.

We hope you have time to read Jessica Schulberg’s article, cross-posted below, and that you will share it if you find it useful. The US people need to know what injustices are still being done in their name when it comes to Guantánamo, and Abdul Latif Nasser’s story is depressingly instructive. 

The Man Who Almost Escaped Guantánamo Bay
By Jessica Schulberg, Huffington Post, August 4, 2018

After 14 years of imprisonment without charge, Abdul Latif Nasser thought he was finally going home. Then Donald Trump won.

CASABLANCA, Morocco — Mustafa Nasser was driving through the crowded streets of Casablanca when his phone rang. Christopher Chang, a human rights investigator, was calling with good news: The U.S. government had just recommended the release of Mustafa’s younger brother Abdul Latif. It was July 2016, and after more than 14 years of imprisonment without charge in the U.S. military base on Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, Abdul Latif was coming home.

Mustafa choked back tears as he thanked Chang for relaying the good news. He started planning for his brother’s homecoming. The family would clear out a newly renovated room in the house where Abdul Latif grew up. They would give it a fresh coat of white paint just before his arrival, to signify a fresh start. Mustafa would train his brother to be a water treatment engineer at his company. And his sister Khadija had started the search for a bride for Abdul Latif.

But two years later, Abdul Latif Nasser still hasn’t come home.

After Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential election, officials in the Obama administration raced to get cleared prisoners out of Guantánamo before Inauguration Day. Trump had vowed to keep the prison open, and they knew the chances of detainees getting released under the incoming administration were slim.

They managed to transfer 19 men out of the prison during the transition. But due to a series of bureaucratic delays and interagency disagreements, they left behind Nasser and four other men who had been cleared for release. One of the men was even measured for civilian clothing and photographed for out-processing — but when the plane arrived, he wasn’t allowed aboard.

Now Nasser, 53, is back where he started in 2002: facing indefinite detention in Guantánamo Bay without charge.

Growing up, Nasser wanted to become a math teacher, maybe in Australia; he was attracted to a place that would be different than the one where he grew up. He studied math and science in college, but followed his oldest brother, Abdul Wahid, to Libya before finishing his degree. Then, he disappeared.

Nasser’s sister Khadija was the first to receive the news. After years of silence, she received a letter from Nasser in Guantánamo, delivered by the International Committee of the Red Cross. He told his family not to worry and asked for pictures. He didn’t say where he had been or whom he had been traveling with.

According to the Pentagon, Nasser had traveled to Sudan in 1993 “in search of the perfect Islamic society” and started working at a company owned by Osama bin Laden as a supervisor for a charcoal production unit. After a failed attempt to travel to Chechnya to “conduct extremist operations,” the Pentagon alleged in a leaked detainee assessment, Nasser followed bin Laden to Afghanistan.

It’s nearly impossible for journalists to verify whether the Pentagon’s allegations are true. Several of the military’s assessments of Guantánamo detainees have turned out to contain incorrect or unverified information.

“Over the years, a lot of the purported evidence in [Nasser’s] case has been discredited by court findings of [the] unreliability of several key witnesses in his case and others,” Shelby Sullivan-Bennis, one of Nasser’s lawyers, told HuffPost. But it’s hard for Nasser’s team to rebut some of the allegations against him because the government has maintained a “monopolistic chokehold on which evidence gets declassified and which does not,” she added.

Fighters with the Northern Alliance, a U.S.-aligned group in Afghanistan that opposed the Taliban, captured Nasser shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks and handed him over to the U.S., according to the Pentagon. Nasser’s lawyers say he was sold to the Americans for a bounty. The U.S. military held Nasser in Kandahar, Afghanistan, for about three months before transferring him to Guantánamo on May 3, 2002.

Nasser and his family spent the next decade and a half working through the arduous processes that the U.S. government upheld as his only path to freedom. He filed a habeas corpus petition — a legal challenge of his imprisonment — in 2005 in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and denied being a member of al Qaeda or any other terrorist group. The judge in that case has not yet ruled on whether his imprisonment is lawful.

In 2011, after Nasser had been in Guantánamo for nine years, the Obama administration created the Periodic Review Board, parole-style hearings designed to evaluate which detainees should be released and which should remain held without charge. The process, which was supposed to make it easier for the government to release prisoners who didn’t pose a threat, is nothing like a hearing in a real court. PRB officials don’t have to prove that detainees did anything wrong in order to recommend continued detention. The departments of Defense, Homeland Security, Justice and State, the Joint Staff and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence all have representatives on the board, and each representative has the power to veto the board’s recommendation. But despite the PRB’s limitations, many detainees considered winning its support for their release as tantamount to imminent freedom — especially toward the end of the Obama administration.

Guantanamo prisoner Abdul Latif Nasser's family in Casablanca, Morocco (Photo: Jessica Schulberg for the Huffington Post).The PRB system moves slowly — the hearings didn’t even start until 2013 — and Guantánamo detainees only hear they’ve been scheduled to appear before the board shortly before their hearing. Nasser’s legal team wanted to be ready. So in the spring of 2016, Chang, who was working with Nasser’s lawyers, flew to Casablanca and recorded video interviews with 10 of Nasser’s brothers, sisters, in-laws and nephews in the home where Nasser grew up.

Chang wanted to show U.S. officials a glimpse of the stable life awaiting Nasser back home. Unlike a lot of the men at Guantánamo, Nasser had a place to live, a job and a caring family waiting for him. He wasn’t likely to become a terrorist.

“He was raised with my children; I consider him one of my children. We miss him so much, and we ask God to accelerate his freedom soon, so that he comes back to us and live with us,” Nasser’s sister-in-law Naima said into the camera, seated in front of a colorful tiled wall in the living room. “Our house is his house, and we are ready to offer him every needed support financially and morally, and all the requirements for a dignified life.”

“I am ready to train Abdul Latif Nasser to work,” Mustafa said. “He is my youngest brother and I love him very much.”

“All of us are ready and prepared to offer him the most precious things we have,” Nasser’s sister Milouda said.

Nasser finally appeared before the PRB on June 7, 2016 — 14 years, one month and four days after he arrived at Guantánamo.

Then he waited.

About a month later, Nasser was led into a room to hear the board’s decision. Sullivan-Bennis dialed in from London. The board recommended sending Nasser home to Morocco once U.S. officials got security assurances from the Moroccan government — including details of how the Moroccans planned to monitor Nasser once he returned home.

Nasser was elated. “I am so excited to see my family,” he told Sullivan-Bennis when they spoke by phone. “I can see my brother’s face now. You will have to come to Morocco, like I told you, and have your honeymoon in Casablanca.”

Nasser thanked Sullivan-Bennis repeatedly. “My lawyers were the light in these dark times,” he said.

By September, Sullivan-Bennis was calling her contacts at the State Department multiple times a week to check on Nasser’s case. One official told her not to worry. Nasser was “absolutely going home,” the official said, according to Sullivan-Bennis.

Finalizing security details should have been relatively easy — Morocco is a close U.S. ally and had already taken in more than a dozen former Guantánamo detainees. But the process dragged on. After Trump won, State Department officials told their counterparts in Morocco it was important they wrap up Nasser’s case before the president-elect entered office. But as Trump’s inauguration date drew closer, State Department officials still hadn’t heard back from the Moroccan government. A spokesman for the Moroccan government did not respond to multiple requests for comment about the reason for the delay.

Nasser tried to temper his expectations. He started telling Sullivan-Bennis that he was trying not to envision his life back home just yet. He didn’t want to be let down.

Congress requires the defense secretary to notify lawmakers at least 30 days before sending any detainees out of Guantánamo. That meant that if Congress wasn’t notified by Dec. 21, it would be much harder to get Nasser out before Trump’s inauguration in January.

Nasser and Sullivan-Bennis spoke by phone days before that deadline. “My body is in Guantánamo, but my heart and mind are in Morocco,” Nasser told his lawyer. Time was running out and they were both anxious for answers.

On Christmas Eve, Sullivan-Bennis was meeting some old friends at an Applebee’s in Rhode Island when she saw an incoming call from Thomas Durkin, another lawyer on Nasser’s case. Durkin had heard through informal channels that Defense Secretary Ash Carter had failed to notify lawmakers about Nasser’s release. There was no way to get out of Guantánamo through regular channels before Trump became president.

“I remember taking the phone call outside the restaurant in the freezing cold, sinking into the cement floor thinking, ‘What is happening?’” Sullivan-Bennis said.

Nasser’s counsel teamed up with lawyers at the Center for Constitutional Rights who were representing another cleared detainee. They worked through Christmas, and in January they filed an emergency motion in the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia, urging a federal judge to allow the release of the two prisoners. Their transfers had been delayed due to bureaucratic obstacles unrelated to the facts of their cases, their lawyers argued in the court filing. “If Petitioners are not transferred within the next week by the outgoing administration, they will likely not be transferred from Guantánamo for at least the next four years,” it said.

The motion exposed the Obama administration’s competing priorities. Obama had campaigned on closing Guantánamo and was committed to getting as many men out of the prison as possible before leaving office. But as long as the prison remained open, he was committed to defending the legality of keeping suspected terrorists detained there. Nasser’s case forced the administration to choose which policy to prioritize.

Some State Department and National Security Council officials tried to convince their counterparts at the Justice Department not to fight the emergency motion. But DOJ, which rarely backs down from cases in which its lawyers believe they have a viable legal argument, pushed through.

DOJ lawyers argued that the PRB determination is only a recommendation, not a legally binding final decision. The Moroccan government didn’t agree to the United States’ security conditions until Dec. 28, DOJ wrote in a court filing. At that point, Carter opted to leave the decision to his successor because the Moroccans’ response came less than 30 days before the end of his term.

As the court considered the motion, a handful of NSC staffers worked through Martin Luther King Jr. Day weekend drafting a memorandum they hoped to deliver to Obama, explaining the urgency of the case. The memo never reached the president.

On Jan. 19, 2017, the day before Trump’s inauguration, a federal judge ruled against Nasser.

The Obama administration had won. It had successfully defended the legality of continuing to imprison a man it had fought for months to release.

The absurdity of the situation wasn’t lost on the lawyers who worked on the emergency motion.

“Why did the Obama administration continue to fight for the right to detain two individuals that it had determined no longer needed to be detained? Why did they fight that all the way up until the day before the inauguration?” asked J. Wells Dixon, a senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights.

“It doesn’t make sense, but it is symptomatic of the Obama administration’s effort to close Guantánamo,” Dixon continued. “The president said all of the right things … but his administration — and he, himself, as commander in chief — were unwilling to take the necessary steps to achieve closure. And in fact, when it came to [the emergency motion], they took steps that were contrary to the stated desire to close the prison.”

A spokesman for Obama declined to comment on whether the former president regrets not intervening on Nasser’s behalf.

Nasser’s siblings worried how he would cope with the disappointment. His spirits had plummeted. “It was worse than when he was arrested. He was depressed; he was hopeless,” Mustafa recalled earlier this year, seated among about a dozen relatives who had once again gathered in the family home to make the case for Nasser’s release.

When Sullivan-Bennis tried to call Nasser at the end of January, he declined to talk. It was the first time he had rejected a call or a visit from her, she said.

Nasser apologized profusely the next time he and Sullivan-Bennis spoke. He didn’t blame her, he said, he just wasn’t ready to talk about it when she had called. She apologized too. She faulted herself for letting him get his hopes up, for taking her government at its word.

After Trump’s election, Sullivan-Bennis’ contacts at the State Department assured her they would still be around to provide updates about her clients. Officials who worked on Guantánamo issues met with Trump’s transition team and tried to convince them not to gut the team. Even if Trump had no plans to close the prison or release any more detainees, he needed Guantánamo experts to keep track of the detainees who had already been transferred out, they argued.

But the State Department disbanded the office that handled detainee issues soon after Trump took over. Ian Moss, a staffer who had helped negotiate the transfer of dozens of men out of Guantánamo, was reassigned to responding to Freedom of Information Act requests. (He has since been moved to the State Department office that deals with war crimes.)

Nasser has tried to pass the time at Guantánamo by doing things that could help him restart his life if he ever gets out. He has taught himself English and created a 2,000-word English-to-Arabic dictionary. He sometimes writes notes to Sullivan-Bennis.

He is hesitant to ask his lawyer for favors, but he sometimes asks her to bring him books. He usually requests books about family dynamics, titles such as The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work: A Practical Guide From the Country’s Foremost Relationship Expert, How to Talk So Kids Will Listen & Listen So Kids Will Talk, and The Glass Castle: A Memoir. He is trying to learn how to be a good husband and a good father for when he returns home, he has told Sullivan-Bennis.

But there’s no indication the Trump administration is working to send Nasser — or any of the cleared Guantánamo detainees — home. Nowadays, when Sullivan-Bennis calls the people she used to work with at the State Department, no one picks up the phone. When she emails, she gets a bounce-back message:

I have been directed to cease working on Guantánamo detention-related matters. The office of Guantánamo Closure is no longer staffed, so please direct any Guantánamo detention-related inquiries to the appropriate regional bureau.

Since Trump took office, the PRB process that failed Nasser has slowed to nearly a halt. Only 11 prisoners have received hearings — and none of those hearings has resulted in a recommendation for release. One man has been waiting for more than a year to get the results of his PRB hearing. The only prisoner to leave Guantánamo under Trump so far is Ahmed al-Darbi, who struck a plea deal years ago that required him to be transferred to a prison in Saudi Arabia on Feb. 20 of this year. The Trump administration didn’t send him back until May.

In January, on the 16th anniversary of the opening of the Guantánamo prison, Nasser and 10 other detainees filed a new legal challenge against the Trump administration. Trump “has explicitly endorsed indefinite detention,” the prisoners’ lawyers wrote in a legal filing, citing Trump’s past statements.

Justice Department lawyer Ronald Wiltsie admitted in a hearing on July 11 that the government had made no effort toward transferring the cleared prisoners. The government could hold Nasser and the other men at Guantánamo for 100 years if it wanted to, as long as the U.S. remains at war with terrorist groups like al Qaeda or any of its affiliates, Wiltsie claimed in court.

Cleared detainees like Nasser are stuck in a “no man’s land” where they are not subject to any type of review process but are also not any closer to freedom, Thomas Hogan, the federal judge handling some of the detainees’ cases, said during the hearing.

Nasser’s relatives still talk about the big party they’re going to throw when he finally comes home. They’ll cook tajine and couscous, some of his favorite dishes.

Each month, they make the hourlong drive from Casablanca to the International Committee of the Red Cross office in Rabat. From there, they are allowed one two-hour video call with Nasser per month. They have to follow certain ground rules: They can’t take pictures of Nasser and they can’t ask him how he is being treated at Guantánamo. They don’t like the rules, but it’s better than not hearing from him at all. Because they can’t ask him much about how he’s doing, they mostly give him updates about how they’re doing — since Nasser got to Guantánamo, his brother Mustafa has had four children and two of his nephews have gotten married. During the calls, he always tells his family not to worry about him.

But Nasser is worried about himself, he’s admitted to Sullivan-Bennis. He was diagnosed with high blood pressure years ago, which doctors at Guantánamo treated with blood thinners, Sullivan-Bennis said. He was concerned about whether he was receiving the right treatment but didn’t protest since he thought he’d be going home soon. Back in Casablanca, he could see another doctor, get himself on a healthier diet and exercise more, he thought.

After realizing his release was no longer imminent, Nasser started to work on his health in Guantánamo.

He started exercising regularly and requesting catfish, one of the healthier meal options at the prison, for every meal. A Guantánamo spokeswoman provided a sample menu to HuffPost and said the prison accommodates dietary requests. But Nasser told his lawyer that, for months, even the catfish was served fried. So three times a day, he peeled off the batter and left it on the side of his plate.

He doesn’t want to die at Guantánamo Bay.

Iman El Haddad, a journalist based in Morocco, provided interpretation.

Andy Worthington is a freelance investigative journalist, activist, author, photographer, film-maker and singer-songwriter (the lead singer and main songwriter for the London-based band The Four Fathers, whose music is available via Bandcamp). He is the co-founder of the Close Guantánamo campaign (and see the latest photo campaign here) and the successful We Stand With Shaker campaign of 2014-15, and the author of The Guantánamo Files: The Stories of the 774 Detainees in America’s Illegal Prison (click on the following for Amazon in the US and the UK) and of two other books: Stonehenge: Celebration and Subversion and The Battle of the Beanfield. He is also the co-director (with Polly Nash) of the documentary film, “Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo” (available on DVD here — or here for the US), and for his photo project ‘The State of London’ he publishes a photo a day from six years of bike rides around the 120 postcodes of the capital.

In 2017, Andy became very involved in housing issues. He is the narrator of a new documentary film, ‘Concrete Soldiers UK’, about the destruction of council estates, and the inspiring resistance of residents, he wrote a song ‘Grenfell’, in the aftermath of the entirely preventable fire in June that killed over 70 people, and he also set up ‘No Social Cleansing in Lewisham’ as a focal point for resistance to estate destruction and the loss of community space in his home borough in south east London.

To receive new articles in your inbox, please subscribe to Andy’s RSS feed — and he can also be found on Facebook (and here), Twitter, Flickr and YouTube. Also see the six-part definitive Guantánamo prisoner list, The Complete Guantánamo Files, the definitive Guantánamo habeas list, the full military commissions list, and the chronological list of all Andy’s articles.

Please also consider joining the Close Guantánamo campaign, and, if you appreciate Andy’s work, feel free to make a donation.

21 Responses

  1. Andy Worthington says...

    When I posted this on Facebook, I wrote:

    Here’s my latest article, cross-posting, with my own introduction, a detail article for the Huffington Post by Jessica Schulberg about Abdul Latif Nasser, the last Moroccan in Guantanamo, who is one of five men still held (out of 40 prisoners in total) who were unanimously approved for release by high-level US government review processes under President Obama. In Nasser’s case, he was approved for release in summer 2016 by a Periodic Review Board, a parole-type process, but then the Moroccan government failed to fill out the appropriate paperwork until three weeks before Obama left office, which was too late for Nasser because, to be released, the defense secretary is required, by laws introduced by Republicans, to give Congress 30 days’ notice. As a result, this man, unanimously not regarded as a threat by representatives of the US government, and with a loving family back in Casablanca waiting to support him, remains trapped at Guantanamo with no hope of being released because Donald Trump has no interest in releasing any Guantanamo prisoners whatsoever.
    I honestly find it hard to explain how disgraceful this story is, and how badly it reflects not only on Trump, but also on Obama and his administration (and particularly the Justice Department, which fought a last-minute appeal to get him freed before Trump took office), on Congress, on the US courts, and on the US media and the US people, who, for the most part, simply don’t care enough about what is being done in their name at Guantanamo.

  2. Andy Worthington says...

    Natalia R Scott wrote:

    I just finished the translation of the article on him for World Can’t Wait. Really sad story. Breaks my heart.

  3. Andy Worthington says...

    Yes, I’m so grateful to Shelby Sullivan-Bennis and to Reprieve for working so hard to keep their clients’ stories in the public eye, Natalia.

  4. Andy Worthington says...

    Natalia R Scott wrote:

    Andy, yes, me too. She appears a lot in the article. My respects to her and Reprieve.

  5. Andy Worthington says...

    Sanchez Montebello wrote:

    Trump has a personal hatred of O’Bummer ever since Trump was embarrassed by him at one of the Washington Press Corps dinners.
    Trump has made it a POINT to reverse every single accomplishment or laws that O’Bummer was able to pass. Unfortunately, Abdul Latif Nasser is one of those “reversals” that Trump takes great delight in reversing.

  6. Andy Worthington says...

    Thanks for that, Sanchez. I had Trump’s hatred of Obama down to simple racism, but hadn’t realized that Obama had humiliated him.

  7. Andy Worthington says...

    Zulekha Adam wrote:

    Shouldn’t Obama have the integrity to intervene and demand the release of Abdul Latif since it is he who left this innocent man in a Kafkaesque limbo. It is he who reneged on his promise to close this horrendous hell hole.

  8. Andy Worthington says...

    Yes, it’s significant, isn’t it, that Obama’s spokesperson had no comment, Zulekha.

  9. Andy Worthington says...

    Natalia R Scott wrote:

    So inhumane.

  10. Andy Worthington says...

    Absolutely, Natalia. I haven’t met Jessica Schulberg, but she’s done a great job on this story. I hope the Huffington Post have put some effort into promoting it.

  11. Andy Worthington says...

    But of course while education is one thing, Natalia, we also need action – a major US media outlet actively calling, on a daily basis, for Guantanamo to be closed, for example. Sadly, though, I just can’t imagine that happening.

  12. Andy Worthington says...

    Natalia R Scott wrote:

    me neither … all your effort on not letting them being forgotten but in the US they already are

  13. Andy Worthington says...

    What’s particularly dispiriting – and somewhat alarming, to be honest – is that there just aren’t that many people in the US who are interested, Natalia. Those who care haven’t forgotten, but the mass of the American people have never been very bothered by it all. The times of the greatest opposition to Guantanamo were at the end of Bush’s presidency, when it had all gone so sour that it affected public opinion (and enabled Obama to take over), and in 2013 when the mass hunger strike finally punctured Obama’s cloak of imperviousness, and made him act. On each occasion, Democrats were motivated in large numbers, but they promptly forgot that it takes more than passing indignation to remove this stain on America’s name.

  14. Andy Worthington says...

    Aleksey Penskiy wrote:

    Andy, how does the American church treat the Guantanamo problem? I heard that Americans are very religious.

  15. Andy Worthington says...

    Yes, it’s an interesting question, Aleksey. Some principled religious people in the US are very opposed to what’s been happening since 9/11. Witness Against Torture involves many people who are Catholic Workers (http://www.witnessagainsttorture.com, https://www.catholicworker.org) then there are the Quakers whose primary commitment is to peace (and opposing militarism). There’s also the National Religious Campaign Against Torture (NRCAT): http://www.nrcat.org
    But much of America’s religion has nothing to do with morality or ethics. Churches are aggressively run as businesses, with charismatic leaders who define “success” though wealth, and I often joke that the US version of the Bible seems to focus almost entirely on the US flag, on gun use, and on celebrating capitalism, when all of those things would have appalled Jesus.

  16. Tom says...

    Churches in the US are tax exempt. One condition of maintaining that is that they can’t engage in “blatant political activity”. Translation: if any of them criticize Guantanamo or torture, they could be investigated by the Internal Revenue Service. Not all but many are multi million dollar corporations. Does a “man of God” have to live in a mansion and have his own private jet? The Catholic Church has over $1 trillion in global assets.

  17. Andy Worthington says...

    Thanks for your comments, Tom. A quick search suggests to me that there’s no problem with churches getting involved in politics if it’s right-wing politics. In ‘How US churches exploit tax exemption to promote faith-based politics’ in the Guardian in November 2012, Katherine Stewart explained that, “With the IRS turning a blind eye, the Christian right is getting its political advertising subsidised by American taxpayers”: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/nov/20/us-churches-tax-exemption-faithbased-politics
    And last year, Trump signed an executive order which, as Reuters put it, “allows tax-exempt churches to more actively participate in politics and could free religious organizations to deny employees insurance coverage for birth-control pills”: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-religion-idUSKBN18025T

  18. Tom says...

    You’re correct. Many treat it like a right wing business and demand that you constantly pay your “fair share” to be able to “worship”.

  19. Tom says...

    Does a “man of God” really need a mega million dollar state of the art TV studio/business complex?

  20. Andy Worthington says...

    The ways in which human beings delude themselves constantly amazes me, Tom!

  21. Andy Worthington says...

    In a word, no, Tom, but this sort of materialism predates the US, that’s for sure. I finally made it to Rome six years ago, and queued in the burning sun for several hours to get to see the Papal treasures. Good grief! It was like every museum in the world rolled up into one. Extraordinary wealth – and yet, didn’t Jesus say that it was easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the gates of heaven?

Leave a Reply

Back to the top

Back to home page

Andy Worthington

Investigative journalist, author, campaigner, commentator and public speaker. Recognized as an authority on Guantánamo and the “war on terror.” Co-founder, Close Guantánamo, co-director, We Stand With Shaker. Also, singer and songwriter (The Four Fathers) and photographer.
Email Andy Worthington

CD: Love and War

The Four Fathers on Bandcamp

The Guantánamo Files book cover

The Guantánamo Files

The Battle of the Beanfield book cover

The Battle of the Beanfield

Stonehenge: Celebration & Subversion book cover

Stonehenge: Celebration & Subversion

Outside The Law DVD cover

Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo

RSS

Posts & Comments

World Wide Web Consortium

XHTML & CSS

WordPress

Powered by WordPress

Designed by Josh King-Farlow

Please support Andy Worthington, independent journalist:

Archives

In Touch

Follow me on Facebook

Become a fan on Facebook

Subscribe to me on YouTubeSubscribe to me on YouTube

The State of London

The State of London. 16 photos of London

Andy's Flickr photos

Campaigns

Categories

Tag Cloud

Afghans in Guantanamo Al-Qaeda Andy Worthington British prisoners Center for Constitutional Rights CIA torture prisons Close Guantanamo David Cameron Donald Trump Four Fathers Guantanamo Housing crisis Hunger strikes London Military Commission NHS NHS privatisation Periodic Review Boards Photos President Obama Reprieve Shaker Aamer The Four Fathers Torture UK austerity UK protest US courts Video We Stand With Shaker Yemenis in Guantanamo