I wrote the following article for the “Close Guantánamo” website, which I established in January 2012 with US attorney Tom Wilner. Please join us — just an email address is required to be counted amongst those opposed to the ongoing existence of Guantánamo, and to receive updates of our activities by email.
The hunger strike at Guantánamo shows no sign of ending, and as a result we at “Close Guantánamo” fear, every day, that we will hear news of some unfortunate soul’s death at the prison. Every day we also wait, in vain, for President Obama to take leadership on the issue, and to pledge to release some of the 86 men (out of 166 in total), who were cleared for release at least three years ago by an inter-agency task force that the President established when he took office in 2009 — when, of course, he also promised to close Guantánamo within a year, but failed to do so.
We have been covering the hunger strike since it first surfaced, and we continue to monitor it, and to urge people to put pressure on President Obama and Chuck Hagel, the defense secretary, to bring it to an end the only way that is acceptable — not with lockdowns and the use of solitary confinement, but with political courage, and a sense of what is right and what is wrong.
Holding men who have been cleared for release by sober and sensible officials from the key government departments and the intelligence agencies is completely unacceptable, under any circumstances, and it demeans America for this situation to be ongoing, day after day, with the world’s media finally paying attention once more, after years of indifference.
President Obama needs to drop his ban on releasing any cleared Yemenis, and lawmakers need to acknowledge that their legislation preventing the release of prisoners and the closure of the prison is cruelly unjust and counter-productive.
With the military on Monday acknowledging that 100 prisoners are taking part in the hunger strike (edging ever closer to the figure of 130 that has long been cited by the prisoners themselves), and with additional medical personnel being flown out to Guantánamo to help out, the situation has, frankly, become intolerable.
Below, we’re posting an op-ed, dealing with just these issues, that was written for the Huffington Post by John Hutson and Donald J. Guter, former Judge Advocates General of the US Navy, who were signatories to our mission statement here at “Close Guantánamo,” when we launched this website and campaign back in January 2012.
The fundamental question of whether Guantánamo should even exist as a prison has been lost in the cacophony over hunger strikes, the prosecution’s access to defense client-privileged email, government eavesdropping on attorney-client conferences, and the overall abject failure of military commissions to prosecute alleged terrorists in any meaningful way.
Let’s look at the basic question of whether to keep Gitmo open at all. We stood behind the President on his second day in office along with over a dozen other retired admirals and generals as he signed an executive order directing that Gitmo be closed and the prisoners transferred to prisons in the U.S. That was five long years ago, yet with the support of Congress, it remains open in spite of the direct order of the Commander in Chief.
The heinous crime resulting in the tragedy in Boston doesn’t reframe the question. Justice still is America’s greatest asset and our greatest export. One way or the other, we will demonstrate our system of justice in a very real way that will capture the attention of the whole world. The Boston evildoer(s) can be prosecuted in Federal Court and imprisoned in the federal prison system. That would send a powerful message to the world about our values, our strength, and our courage. Or, we can imprison the perpetrator(s) in Gitmo and let them rot there forever. That would send a very different message — one of fear and retribution.
Gitmo costs the U.S. in many ways. One way and the easiest to quantify is that it costs upwards of $177M per year to maintain, and the Department of Defense has requested almost $200M more to renovate it. $177M is over a million dollars for each of the 166 detainees imprisoned there. There is a basic factual fallacy about Guantánamo — that these 166 men are all very bad guys who deserve whatever they get. That is not true. At most, twenty of the prisoners are accused terrorists who will be tried for war crimes. 86 of the 166 prisoners have been cleared for release. Indeed, they have been cleared for several years now.
The average cost to house a prisoner in a supermax prison in the U.S. is less than $30K. Try to imagine what we could buy with the savings if Gitmo were closed and the 86 detainees already cleared were in fact released, and the remaining prisoners were held in Federal Prison here instead. How many Marines, how many Navy Seals, how many bombs and bullets would those millions of dollars buy? How many veterans’ claims efficiently processed and paid? How many hot lunches for underprivileged school children? It is a terrible waste.
Gitmo also costs the United States dearly in terms of our international reputation. Courts in other countries have declined to render alleged terrorists to U.S. custody for fear they will be tried in military commissions in Guantánamo. Although the facility itself is adequate for a prison, it is largely viewed in the international community as America’s gulag. Supermax prisons, from which no one ever escapes, are no weekend spa to be sure, but Gitmo is an avoidable, self-inflicted wound.
As retired Navy officers, we also object to holding alleged terrorists in a military prison. This implies the status of “soldier” which they decidedly do not deserve. If the twenty or so accused terrorists at Guantánamo are guilty of what the prosecution apparently believes they have done, they are simply criminals, not soldiers. We should treat them like alleged criminals, without honor, and not elevate them to a higher, undeserved status.
The time is long past for Gitmo to close. Terrorists are successfully and safely prosecuted in courtrooms around the world including in the U.S. practically every week. What are we afraid of? We clearly want bad men to be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Gitmo has impeded that effort, not facilitated it. The first step for successful prosecutions is to close Gitmo and bring them here to the United States for prosecution.
The president should appoint a person of unquestioned stature and experience to work within the Administration and Congress to effectuate his long standing Executive Order. No committees, no studies, no more analysis. Appoint someone to get it done.
The authors are former Judge Advocates General of the Navy. Mr. Guter is currently dean of South Texas College of Law/Houston and Mr. Hutson is dean emeritus of University of New Hampshire School of Law.
Andy Worthington is the author of The Guantánamo Files: The Stories of the 774 Detainees in America’s Illegal Prison (published by Pluto Press, distributed by Macmillan in the US, and available from Amazon — click on the following for the US and the UK) and of two other books: Stonehenge: Celebration and Subversion and The Battle of the Beanfield. To receive new articles in your inbox, please subscribe to my RSS feed — and I can also be found on Facebook, Twitter, Flickr (my photos) and YouTube. Also see my definitive Guantánamo prisoner list, updated in April 2012, “The Complete Guantánamo Files,” a 70-part, million-word series drawing on files released by WikiLeaks in April 2011, and details about the documentary film, “Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo” (co-directed by Polly Nash and Andy Worthington, and available on DVD here — or here for the US). Also see my definitive Guantánamo habeas list and the chronological list of all my articles, and please also consider joining the “Close Guantánamo campaign”, and, if you appreciate my work, feel free to make a donation.
On Facebook, Kristin Higgins wrote:
Obama promised to close Guantanimo Bay. He has faced opposition to it, but at the end of the day, he is the commander in chief of the military and that is a military prison. To this day it is still open. Now, he finally pays a little bit of attention to it.
Out of the 166 prisoners there, more than half have been cleared for release. NONE have been charged with a crime. They have been “interrogated using enhanced interrogation techniques,” (a word that the United States calls torture when someone else does it against their citizens), and some of them have been there for 13 years. You get one shot at life, folks. Think of spending 13 years of it away from any contact with your family and to have to spend it there, where your own body doesn’t even belong to you. And you did nothing to land yourself there. You were at the wrong place at the wrong time and you were swept away by a fascist government that was encourage by over-reactive citizens who see a terrorist behind every rock. Problem is, it is becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. If you think there won’t be blowback from policies like this then I think you are incredibly naive
Thanks, Kristin. I recognize the indignation in your comments, and I also commend you for pointing out that Obama “is the commander in chief of the military and that is a military prison.” I’ll be writing about the President’s little speech about Guantanamo tomorrow.
Agastyan Daram wrote:
Obama mentioned Guantanamo today..
Yes, as I mentioned, commentary to follow tomorrow, Agastyan. He said a lot of the right words, but we’ve heard all that before.
Agastyan Daram wrote:
for sure.. but it felt good to hear it today. hope he does more than talk this time around.. Keep up the good work..
Thanks, Agastyan. We now need to push Obama to appoint someone to deal specifically with Guantanamo, to push him to engage with Congress, and to use his waiver fairly swiftly if Congress won’t play ball. If lawmakers are the problem, and not him, he needs to make sure they aren’t allowed to continue dictating policies that are damaging to all notions of justice. He said some good things, that’s for sure; now he needs to undertake the good actions.
Barbara Carroll wrote:
BBC and Chris Hayes (MSNBC) covered story as well.
Yes, and I was on some of the BBC’s coverage, Barbara: http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2013/05/01/andy-worthington-discusses-the-guantanamo-hunger-strike-on-the-bbc/
Agastyan Daram wrote, in response to 6, above:
When the energy is positive, keep it flowing in the right direction, and things will work out. Its just a matter of keeping him to his word.. There is positive stuff being said on both sides. Its a matter of putting it all together.
I like your philosophy, Agastyan!
Willy Bach wrote:
Thanks Andy, yes, plenty of indignation, slight movement in the Oval Office – shared, tweeted.
That sums it up, Willy. Good to hear from you. We’re trying to get Obama to appoint someone to deal specifically with the closure of Guantanamo, to drop his ban on releasing Yemenis, to tackle Congress and/or use his waiver to release prisoners, including the Yemenis, and to initiate objective reviews of the cases of the 46 men designated for indefinite detention.
Investigative journalist, author, filmmaker, photographer and Guantanamo expert
Email Andy Worthington
Please support Andy Worthington, independent journalist: