United Nations and New York Times Call for Closure of Guantánamo and End to Indefinite Detention

10.4.13

I wrote the following article for the “Close Guantánamo” website, which I established in January 2012 with US attorney Tom Wilner. Please join us — just an email address is required to be counted amongst those opposed to the ongoing existence of Guantánamo, and to receive updates of our activities by email.

The ongoing hunger strike at Guantánamo is now in its third month, and shows no sign of coming to an end. As stories have emerged from the prisoners, via their lawyers, we have learned that it was inspired by deteriorating conditions at the prison, and by the prisoners’ despair at ever being released.

Their despair, sadly, is understandable.

Although 86 of the remaining 166 prisoners were cleared for release at least three years ago by an inter-agency Guantánamo Review Task Force established by President Obama, they are still held because of cynical Congressional obstruction, and weakness on the part of President Obama — in particular through his failure to close the prison, as he promised when he took office, and because of a ban he imposed in January 2010 on releasing any cleared Yemenis, who make up two-thirds of the cleared prisoners, which he issued in the wake of a failed bomb plot involving a Nigerian man recruited in Yemen.

In addition, the other 80 prisoners also have legitimate grievances against the Obama administration and Congress. 46 were designated for indefinite detention without charge or trial by the Task Force, on the outrageous and unjustifiable basis that they are too dangerous to release, even though insufficient evidence exists to put them on trial. This means that the so-called evidence is fundamentally untrustworthy, but two years ago President Obama issued an executive order authorizing their indefinite detention, which he tried to make palatable by promising periodic reviews of the men’s cases. These, however, have not materialized.

The rest of the men were recommended for trials by the Task Force, but they too have largely fallen by the wayside. Just six men are currently facing pre-trial hearings for their planned trials by military commission at Guantánamo, and most of the charges that others would face — providing material support for terrorism, and conspiracy — were dismissed by conservative appeals court judges in recent months, discrediting the commissions but effectively consigning those who would have been put forward for trials to indefinite detention.

Whether by accident or design, therefore, indefinite detention is what unites all the prisoners, and defines President Obama’s stewardship of the wretched facility that he inherited from George W. Bush. It is time for the President to put aside what appears to be his indifference towards securing the closure of the prison, to drop the ban on releasing any cleared Yemenis, to push Congress to work with him regarding the release of other prisoners, and to initiate a genuinely objective analysis of the dangers allegedly posed by the other prisoners, to begin the necessary movement towards the closure of the prison.

Criticism of President Obama by Navi Pillay, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights

To this end, it is heartening that high-level criticism of the President — both internationally and domestically — has increased noticeably in the last week. On April 5, Navi Pillay, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, spoke out.

In a statement, she “urged all branches of the United States Government to work together to close the Guantánamo detention center,” saying that “the continuing indefinite incarceration of many of the detainees amounts to arbitrary detention and is in clear breach of international law.”

Noting that “around half of the 166 detainees still being held in detention have been cleared for transfer to either home countries or third countries for resettlement,” and that others “have been designated for further indefinite detention,” she pointed out, “Some of them have been festering in this detention center for more than a decade. This raises serious concerns under international law. It severely undermines the United States’ stance that it is an upholder of human rights, and weakens its position when addressing human rights violations elsewhere.”

Commenting on the hunger strike, Navi Pillay said that “a hunger strike is a desperate act, and one which brings a clear risk of people doing serious lasting harm to themselves. I always urge people to think of alternative, less dangerous, ways to protest about their situation. But given the uncertainty and anxieties surrounding their prolonged and apparently indefinite detention in Guantánamo, it is scarcely surprising that people’s frustrations boil over and they resort to such desperate measures.”

Referring to President Obama’s promise, when he took office, of “placing a high priority on closing Guantánamo and setting in motion a system to safeguard the fundamental rights of the detainees,” she “welcomed a White House spokesman’s reiteration of this commitment [on March 27] citing Congressional legislation as the prime obstacle,” but refused to allow the Obama administration to side-step its responsibilities.

Noting that the “systemic abuse of individuals’ human rights continues year after year,” she said, “We must be clear about this: the United States is in clear breach not just of its own commitments but also of international laws and standards that it is obliged to uphold. When other countries breach these standards, the US — quite rightly — strongly criticizes them for it.”

She added, “As a first step, those who have been cleared for release must be released. This is the most flagrant breach of individual rights, contravening the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Last September’s death of Adnan Latif — the ninth person to die in detention at Guantánamo — was a sobering reminder of the problems with the Guantánamo detention regime under which individuals are detained indefinitely, in most cases without charge or trial. It is time to bring an end to this situation.”

Pillay also said she was “deeply concerned over the continued obstacles the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013 has created for the closure of the detention facility, as well as for the trial of detainees in civilian courts, where warranted, or for their release.” She pointed out that she “has repeatedly maintained that those Guantánamo detainees who are accused of crimes should be tried in civilian courts, particularly as the military commissions — even after improvements made in 2009 — do not meet international fair trial standards.”

She also called on the United States Government to “extend an invitation which would allow full and unfettered access to the United Nations Human Rights Council experts, including the opportunity to meet privately with detainees.” Under President Obama, as with President Bush, all UN requests to visit the prison and meet the prisoners privately have been refused.

Criticism of President Obama by the editors of the New York Times

The same day that Navi Pillay issued her statement, the New York Times also ran an editorial that was severely critical of the Obama administration. Noting that, for the prisoners at Guantánamo, the hunger strike “is again exposing the lawlessness of the system that marooned them there,” the editors proceeded to describe the hunger strike as “a collective act of despair,” noting, “Prisoners on the hunger strike say that they would rather die than remain in the purgatory of indefinite detention. Only three prisoners now at Guantánamo have been found guilty of any crime, yet the others also are locked away, with dwindling hope of ever being released.”

The Times editorial also noted that there have been many hunger strikes since the prison opened in 2002, and mentioned a “major strike” in 2005, which involved more than 200 prisoners, although the editors recognized that “those earlier actions were largely about the brutality of treatment the detainees received,” whereas the protest this time “seems more fundamental.” Echoing Tom Wilner, one of the members of the steering committee of “Close Guantánamo,” in his recent opinion piece for the Washington Post, the Times‘ editors noted that Gen. John Kelly, the Marine commander of  SouthCom, which oversees Guantánamo, told a Congressional hearing last month that the prisoners “had great optimism that Guantánamo would be closed” when President Obama promised that it would be, four years ago, but are now “devastated,” because that promise has been broken and they feel abandoned.

Moving on to analyze specific statistics about Guantánamo, the Times‘ editors note that, for 86 of the 166 men still held, “this is a particular outrage,” because they were “approved for release three years ago by a government task force, which included civilian and military agencies responsible for national security.”

Correctly, the editors point out that “Congress outrageously has limited the president’s options in releasing them, through a statute that makes it very difficult to use federal money to transfer Guantánamo prisoners anywhere,” although the blame that should be apportioned to President Obama himself is rather muted. As the editors explain, “Fifty-six of those approved for release are Yemenis,” but whereas the truth is that President Obama very publicly issued a ban on releasing cleared Yemenis over three years ago, in the wake of a failed airline bomb plot undertaken by a Nigerian man recruited in Yemen, the editors’ line is that “the government” has “said it will not release them to Yemen for the ‘foreseeable future,’ apparently because they might fall under the influence of people antagonistic to the United States.”

Moving on to the 30 others approved for release, the editors noted that, in the last ten years, the Times and NPR have determined that “the government has sent detainees to at least 52 countries,” and that, as a result, it “surely can find countries to take detainees who cannot be returned home.”

The editors also look at the 80 other remaining prisoners, noting that “the three who have been convicted and the 30 or so who are subjects of active cases or investigations can be transferred to a military or civilian prison,” but criticizing the administration for holding the rest “in indefinite detention — a legal limbo in which they are considered by the government to be too dangerous to release and too difficult to prosecute.” The editors add, “Such detention is the essence of what has been wrong with Guantánamo from the start. The cases of these detainees must be reviewed and resolved according to the rule of law.”

This is what we have been arguing for here at “Close Guantánamo,” since it became apparent, in December, that the reviews that President Obama promised for the 46 men he consigned to indefinite detention without charge or trial two years ago have not materialized, and it is a demand that we are not only happy to reiterate, but also to remind the administration that we are willing and able to assist in providing objective analyses of the supposed evidence that is being used to justify these men’s detention.

In conclusion, the New York Times editorial notes that the government “is force-feeding at least 10 of the hunger strikers,” even though international agreements among doctors say that “doctors must respect a striker’s decision if he makes ‘an informed and voluntary refusal’ to eat.” That has never applied at Guantánamo, and, as the editors explain, the Obama administration “justifies the force-feeding of detainees as protecting their safety and welfare.”

Instead, however, “the truly humane response to this crisis,” as the editors explain, “is to free prisoners who have been approved for release, end indefinite detention and close the prison at Guantánamo.”

Ask President Obama to finally fulfill his failed promise to close Guantánamo

We congratulate the editors of the New York Times for their fine editorial, and ask those who agree with it to support the three demands for President Obama that we first formulated in an article in February entitled, “The Relentless Importance of Closing Guantánamo,” in which, as well as addressing the main themes of the editorial, we called for the Obama administration to appoint someone specifically to deal with the closure of Guantánamo, to replace Daniel Fried, the senior State Department official who was the envoy for the closure of Guantánamo until recently, when his office was closed down.

Those interested in this topic might like a recent article for The Hill, by Brent Budowsky, a former aide to Sen. Lloyd Bentsen and Bill Alexander, when he was chief deputy majority whip of the House, who proposed last week that Gen. David Petraeus might be the man for the job.

Below are our demands, and we encourage you to write to the President, and to Secretary of State John Kerry, to demand immediate action before any of the hunger strikers at Guantánamo die.

1: Lift the ban on releasing any of the 56 cleared Yemenis from Guantánamo, imposed in January 2010.

2: Appoint a new person to deal specifically with closing Guantánamo, to find new homes for the cleared prisoners in need of assistance.

3: Take the fight to Congress to stop treating the cleared prisoners as pawns in a cynical game of political maneuvering, and to clear the way for all 86 cleared prisoners to be repatriated or safely rehoused in other countries.

Please help us by writing to President Obama, and to Secretary of State John Kerry:

President Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

or email the President.

Secretary of State John Kerry
US Department of State
2201 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520

Andy Worthington is the author of The Guantánamo Files: The Stories of the 774 Detainees in America’s Illegal Prison (published by Pluto Press, distributed by Macmillan in the US, and available from Amazon — click on the following for the US and the UK) and of two other books: Stonehenge: Celebration and Subversion and The Battle of the Beanfield. To receive new articles in your inbox, please subscribe to my RSS feed — and I can also be found on Facebook, Twitter, Flickr (my photos) and YouTube. Also see my definitive Guantánamo prisoner list, updated in April 2012, “The Complete Guantánamo Files,” a 70-part, million-word series drawing on files released by WikiLeaks in April 2011, and details about the documentary film, “Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo” (co-directed by Polly Nash and Andy Worthington, and available on DVD here — or here for the US). Also see my definitive Guantánamo habeas list and the chronological list of all my articles, and please also consider joining the new “Close Guantánamo campaign”, and, if you appreciate my work, feel free to make a donation.

37 Responses

  1. Andy Worthington says...

    On Facebook, Anne Marie Cherigny Aboutayab wrote:

    President Obama in this campaign before being elected said i will close Guantanamo but today it’s still open

  2. Andy Worthington says...

    Yes, and he also set up a task force of government officials and representatives of the intelligence agencies to tell him what to do with the prisoners he inherited, Anne Marie, and they told him that the US had no interest in indefinitely detaining or trying 86 of the 166 men still held, so now he needs to find a way to release those men, and to do it pretty urgently, before anyone dies as a result of the hunger strike.
    The time is over for President Obama to be able to pretend that it is somehow OK being in charge of an abhorrent experimental prison, where those detained are held indefinitely without charge or trial, because it has proven politically inconvenient to release any of them. He needs to act, and he needs to act now!

  3. Andy Worthington says...

    Ted Cartselos wrote:

    You got the wrong guy. He has no backbone.

  4. Andy Worthington says...

    Leonardo L. Larl wrote:

    “….. an abhorrent experimental prison…”, indeed.

  5. Andy Worthington says...

    Afifah Kuddah wrote:

    Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive!

  6. Andy Worthington says...

    Thanks to everyone who has liked and shared this. It’s very much appreciated. And don’t forget please to join us at “Close Guantanamo” if you want to be counted as an opponent of Guantanamo, and want to receive updates on our activities (around 3 emails a month). Just an email address is required to join here: http://www.closeguantanamo.org/Join-Us

  7. Andy Worthington says...

    I know he’s proven to be spineless, Ted, but he knows he has a legacy that is already being written (which will paint him as weak and hypocritical), and he also has advisors who might not want the Democrats to be tainted as the party that kept Guantanamo as an open long-term grave for the men held there, even those they said they wanted to release. That looks very very bad however you try to dress it up. It is an action taken by people who are either chronically weak, or outrageously callous.

  8. Thomas says...

    All that torture and suffering and making America look bad – just to get three people!

  9. harpie says...

    ICRC President Visits Obama, Brennan, Hagel Regarding “International Humanitarian Law”
    http://www.emptywheel.net/2013/04/12/icrc-president-visits-obama-brennan-hagel-regarding-international-humanitarian-law/

  10. Andy Worthington says...

    Three people, Thomas? Who do you mean? I can think of four, and they only got one alive, and, eventually, one dead – bin Laden, al-Zawahiri, Mullah Omar and KSM.

  11. Andy Worthington says...

    Interesting link regarding the ICRC visit. Thanks for sharing.

  12. Andy Worthington says...

    Eduardo Morgado wrote:

    I’m sharing this on my wall

  13. Andy Worthington says...

    Thanks, Eduardo. And thanks to everyone who’s liking and sharing this. It’s the article I posted yesterday on “Close Guantanamo,” and I hope some readers who missed it yesterday will pick up on the importance of the support for the prisoners from the UN and the New York Times.
    And if you haven’t joined the “Close Guantanamo” campaign, and you want to be counted as an opponent of the prison’s continued existence, and want to receive updates on our activities (around 3 emails a month), just an email address is required to join here: http://www.closeguantanamo.org/Join-Us

  14. Andy Worthington says...

    Howard Fass wrote:

    Gitmo is a horrible shame for the USA

  15. Andy Worthington says...

    Jamal Ajouaou wrote:

    after 10 years of Torture for no reason what is left for any man to pick up unless they want them prisoners from the cage in body bags

  16. Andy Worthington says...

    Mui JS wrote:

    Good article. The Hill article was bizarre. Petraeus isn’t exactly known for his stellar human rights record. When I think Petraeus, I think death squads and night raids.

  17. Andy Worthington says...

    Thanks, Howard, Jamal and Mui. Good to hear from you all. Whatever his opinions regarding behavior in the field, Petraeus has a favorable history regarding what he has said about detention. In 2009, he told Radio Free Europe, “I have long been on record as having testified and also in helping write doctrine for interrogation techniques that are completely in line with the Geneva Convention.”

  18. Andy Worthington says...

    Having said that, Petraeus also claimed, “as a division commander in Iraq in the early days, we put out guidance very early on to make sure that our soldiers, in fact, knew that we needed to stay within those guidelines.” Given the torture and abuse in Iraq, that suggests that he had no knowledge of what was happening in the prisons after issuing his “guidance.” Is that really credible?
    The interview’s here: http://www.rferl.org/content/transcript_RFERL_Interviews_US_Central_Command_Chief_General_David_Petraeus/1738626.html

  19. Thomas says...

    The 3 you mentioned as having been convicted of things.

  20. Su says...

    Hi Andy and all –
    I just watched “Torture: Made In USA” on Press TV documentaries (though cant find link at mo). Patraeus comes across surprisingly “well” at the end. All planned? All scripted?
    Please Andy I am in the middle of sending a letter to the whitehouse online like you suggest on the latest email from Close Guantanamo site though not knowing which “subject” to class it under as they only give their headings. Sorry to be ignorant and “derr” which one should I choose?
    Also can suggest 2 or 3 lines for me to send to Chuck Hagel as well. Again sorry to be so “derr”. Thank you. God bless all in this campaign.

  21. Andy Worthington says...

    Hi Su,
    Thanks for your interest. There are a number of options, I suppose. I guess I’d choose “Homeland Security” or “Foreign Policy.”
    And for Hagel, I suggest:
    “Secretary Hagel, please use your authority under the law to resume transferring all of the men the Obama administration does not intend to charge. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA 2013) gives you the authority to certify men or issue waivers so they can be released from Guantánamo, so please use this authority without further delay.”

  22. Andy Worthington says...

    John Randolph Hardison Cain wrote:

    Don’t be fooled by what Petraeus has said. He says he didn’t condone torture but turned a blind eye when the same U.S. agents who trained El Salvador’s death squads came to Iraq to train Iraqi special police units after 2003 and engaged in the cruelest forms of torture and outright murder.

  23. Andy Worthington says...

    Mui JS wrote:

    Andy, I don’t think Petraeus is in any way clean. And I’m not saying that only because of his links to Steele in Iraq via BBC documentary. I thought night raids were his “baby” in Afghanistan.

  24. Andy Worthington says...

    Mui JS wrote:

    I don’t know, but I’m thinking and heard Petreaus is a politician and not in the good sense. If 20 yr old Bradley Manning could figure out what targeting Iraqis meant, then surely Petraeus with his reportedly good working relationship (via BBC documentary) could figure out what providing fodder for gulags meant.

  25. Andy Worthington says...

    Yes, I absolutely share your concerns about Petraeus, John and Mui – hence my suspicion about his comments regarding Iraq, John. In terms of politics, however, where untrustworthy people do things because of some perceived advantage in doing so, I’m curious as to whether he might be able to raise the importance of closing Guantanamo with lawmakers and with other powerful and influential right-wing figures. There won’t be movement on Guantanamo unless (a) President Obama decides he has to act and (b) some of these people are persuaded to change their priorities. Whatever the sincerity or lack of it, Petraeus has a history of expressing public concern about how prisoners are held, and how they are treated.

  26. Andy Worthington says...

    Mui JS wrote:

    At this rate, after reading CliveStafford Smith/Shaker Aamer’s affadavit, I feel so desperate enough to try an unknown kid on Gitmo. But I’m wary Petraeus would just use any support to 1) try to rehabilitate his image, 2) run for president and then 3) dump us.

  27. Andy Worthington says...

    Mui, yes, I understand your concerns, but my bigger concern, right now, is with getting Obama to decide that he needs to act on Guantanamo – releasing prisoners, and reviewing he cases of others – and he needs to act now. We’re still not even getting that message from the administration.

  28. Andy Worthington says...

    Mui JS wrote:

    That’s my bigger concern as well, Andy. Politicians have a way of dumping us and not raising those concerns.

  29. Andy Worthington says...

    Hamja Ahsan wrote:

    Why is the British media so crap?

  30. Andy Worthington says...

    Hamja, yes, that’s a very good rhetorical question. The spinelessness or amnesia of those parts of the British media that claim to be objective has been disgraceful this last week regarding Margaret Thatcher, and I guess you’re also talking about the absence of discussion in the media regarding Shaker Aamer – and your brother.

  31. Andy Worthington says...

    Hamja Ahsan wrote:

    Also these celebrity Leftists – I been emailing them to support us – but silence –

  32. Andy Worthington says...

    Waris Ali wrote:

    Andyyy, we passed 100,000 signatures!!! Some of us were staying up all night watching the countdown lol. Currently at 102,143! Oh and this is the BBC news report on shaker that was done today, listen to the so called “security expert” little douche that he is. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iPH4WY6awU8

  33. Andy Worthington says...

    Thanks, Waris. Great news! I’ll be posting something on this very soon – probably on Sunday. Congratulations to everyone who has worked so hard to reach the target!

  34. Andy Worthington says...

    London Guantánamo Campaign wrote:

    Hi Andy, and while it’s great that the BBC finally reported on the case and gave Shaker’s family a chance to speak, I hope (and am sure) your own article will challenge some of the fictions (long debunked by Wikileaks) stated by the BBC “expert”…

  35. Andy Worthington says...

    I hope so, but sadly the BBC, like all media organisations that sacrifice accuracy for supposed objectivity, gets to inflict serious damage when professional bigots and Islamophobes are allowed to spew their poisonous filth in an unchallenged manner.

  36. Su says...

    Thanks Andy for your help –

    2 letters just wizzed off online – very easy, free and completely painless – recommend to all, to do it.

    For President Obomber (oh sorry my keys just typed that name!!! )

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/submit-questions-and-comments

    For comment to Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel (Do we have a nickname for him?)

    https://kb.defense.gov/app/ask

    Where do we go now?

  37. Andy Worthington says...

    Thanks, Su. I think we need to be encouraging as many people as possible to keep the pressure on. I certainly intend to keep pushing the message.

Leave a Reply

Back to the top

Back to home page

Andy Worthington

Investigative journalist, author, campaigner, commentator and public speaker. Recognized as an authority on Guantánamo and the “war on terror.” Co-founder, Close Guantánamo, co-director, We Stand With Shaker. Also, singer and songwriter (The Four Fathers) and photographer (The State of London).
Email Andy Worthington

CD: Love and War

The Four Fathers on Bandcamp

The Guantánamo Files book cover

The Guantánamo Files

The Battle of the Beanfield book cover

The Battle of the Beanfield

Stonehenge: Celebration & Subversion book cover

Stonehenge: Celebration & Subversion

Outside The Law DVD cover

Outside the Law: Stories from Guantánamo

RSS

Posts & Comments

World Wide Web Consortium

XHTML & CSS

WordPress

Powered by WordPress

Designed by Josh King-Farlow

Please support Andy Worthington, independent journalist:

Archives

In Touch

Follow me on Facebook

Become a fan on Facebook

Subscribe to me on YouTubeSubscribe to me on YouTube

The State of London

The State of London. 16 photos of London

Andy's Flickr photos

Campaigns

Categories

Tag Cloud

Afghans in Guantanamo Al-Qaeda Andy Worthington British prisoners Center for Constitutional Rights CIA torture prisons Close Guantanamo Donald Trump Four Fathers Guantanamo Housing crisis Hunger strikes London Military Commission NHS NHS privatisation Periodic Review Boards Photos President Obama Reprieve Shaker Aamer The Four Fathers Torture UK austerity UK protest US courts Video We Stand With Shaker WikiLeaks Yemenis in Guantanamo