<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guantánamo Uighurs Back in Legal Limbo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2010/03/10/guantanamo-uighurs-back-in-legal-limbo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2010/03/10/guantanamo-uighurs-back-in-legal-limbo/</link>
	<description>Author &#38; journalist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 05:55:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: No Escape from Guantanamo: Uighurs Lose Again in US Court &#171; EUROPE TURKMEN FRIENDSHIPS</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2010/03/10/guantanamo-uighurs-back-in-legal-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-59322</link>
		<dc:creator>No Escape from Guantanamo: Uighurs Lose Again in US Court &#171; EUROPE TURKMEN FRIENDSHIPS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 20:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=7379#comment-59322</guid>
		<description>[...] the offer by Palau was enough for the Supreme Court to turn down the Uighurs’ case in March. Although the Court vacated the February 2009 ruling by the Court of Appeals, denying access to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the offer by Palau was enough for the Supreme Court to turn down the Uighurs’ case in March. Although the Court vacated the February 2009 ruling by the Court of Appeals, denying access to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More “Congressional Depravity” on Guantanamo &#171; SpeakEasy</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2010/03/10/guantanamo-uighurs-back-in-legal-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-58849</link>
		<dc:creator>More “Congressional Depravity” on Guantanamo &#171; SpeakEasy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 14:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=7379#comment-58849</guid>
		<description>[...] resettled in the United States &#8212; even those determined to be innocent of any wrongdoing who should qualify for political asylum &#8212; shows the extent of Congressional depravity on any issues related to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] resettled in the United States &#8212; even those determined to be innocent of any wrongdoing who should qualify for political asylum &#8212; shows the extent of Congressional depravity on any issues related to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AWorthington: Guantanamo Habeas Results, Prisoners 34 &#8211; Government 13 &#171; On Now</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2010/03/10/guantanamo-uighurs-back-in-legal-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-56938</link>
		<dc:creator>AWorthington: Guantanamo Habeas Results, Prisoners 34 &#8211; Government 13 &#171; On Now</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=7379#comment-56938</guid>
		<description>[...] For my analysis of the ruling, see: From Guantánamo to the United States: The Story of the Wrongly Imprisoned Uighurs. For Judge Ricardo Urbina’s unclassified opinion, see here. And see here for a transcript of the hearing. For the releases in Bermuda, see: Who Are The Four Guantánamo Uighurs Sent To Bermuda? For the releases in Palau, see: Who Are The Six Uighurs Released From Guantánamo To Palau? For the releases in Switzerland, see: More Dark Truths from Guantánamo, as Five Innocent Men Released. For the Supreme Court’s refusal to consider the case of the last five Uighurs held, see: Guantánamo Uighurs Back in Legal Limbo. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For my analysis of the ruling, see: From Guantánamo to the United States: The Story of the Wrongly Imprisoned Uighurs. For Judge Ricardo Urbina’s unclassified opinion, see here. And see here for a transcript of the hearing. For the releases in Bermuda, see: Who Are The Four Guantánamo Uighurs Sent To Bermuda? For the releases in Palau, see: Who Are The Six Uighurs Released From Guantánamo To Palau? For the releases in Switzerland, see: More Dark Truths from Guantánamo, as Five Innocent Men Released. For the Supreme Court’s refusal to consider the case of the last five Uighurs held, see: Guantánamo Uighurs Back in Legal Limbo. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Dark Truths From Guantanamo as Five Innocent Men Released &#171; freedetainees.org</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2010/03/10/guantanamo-uighurs-back-in-legal-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-55863</link>
		<dc:creator>More Dark Truths From Guantanamo as Five Innocent Men Released &#171; freedetainees.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 05:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=7379#comment-55863</guid>
		<description>[...] five Uighurs remain in Guantánamo, but their fate is unknown. The Supreme Court refused to proceed with their case at the start of this month (although they did vacate the terrible Court of Appeals&#8217; ruling), [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] five Uighurs remain in Guantánamo, but their fate is unknown. The Supreme Court refused to proceed with their case at the start of this month (although they did vacate the terrible Court of Appeals&#8217; ruling), [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arcticredriver</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2010/03/10/guantanamo-uighurs-back-in-legal-limbo/comment-page-1/#comment-55307</link>
		<dc:creator>arcticredriver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=7379#comment-55307</guid>
		<description>I feel very sorry for the Uyghurs.  And I think the SCOTUS was incorrect to not take up their case since the remaining five have been offered &quot;homes&quot; in Palua.  

The Palua constitution only allows those born in Palua to become citizens.  Agreeing to a transfer there, while it might temporarily be better than being penned in Camp Iguana, is more likely to be a one-way trip. I know my country Canada, and many other countries, have toughened up, and will no longer accept refugees who have stopped off in a third country before applying for refugee status.  While they remain in Guantanamo they can hope to be offered refugee status in a country with a muslim community, where they could resettle their families, and where they would have a reasonable prospect of finding work.

Bermuda&#039;s PM invited the Uyghurs -- even though Bermuda&#039;s foreign policy remains the UK&#039;s responsibility.  He offered them citizenship, and again, if I am not mistaken, he lacked the authority to make that offer too.

If I were one of the Guantanamo captives, who had been cleared for release, but who hadn&#039;t yet been offered a real home, I would decline a transfer to Palau, or Bermuda, or other countries where there was no muslim community, and which would never offer me citizenship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel very sorry for the Uyghurs.  And I think the SCOTUS was incorrect to not take up their case since the remaining five have been offered &#8220;homes&#8221; in Palua.  </p>
<p>The Palua constitution only allows those born in Palua to become citizens.  Agreeing to a transfer there, while it might temporarily be better than being penned in Camp Iguana, is more likely to be a one-way trip. I know my country Canada, and many other countries, have toughened up, and will no longer accept refugees who have stopped off in a third country before applying for refugee status.  While they remain in Guantanamo they can hope to be offered refugee status in a country with a muslim community, where they could resettle their families, and where they would have a reasonable prospect of finding work.</p>
<p>Bermuda&#8217;s PM invited the Uyghurs &#8212; even though Bermuda&#8217;s foreign policy remains the UK&#8217;s responsibility.  He offered them citizenship, and again, if I am not mistaken, he lacked the authority to make that offer too.</p>
<p>If I were one of the Guantanamo captives, who had been cleared for release, but who hadn&#8217;t yet been offered a real home, I would decline a transfer to Palau, or Bermuda, or other countries where there was no muslim community, and which would never offer me citizenship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
