<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bringing Guantánamo To New York</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/11/07/bringing-guantanamo-to-new-york/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/11/07/bringing-guantanamo-to-new-york/</link>
	<description>Investigative journalist, author, filmmaker and Guantanamo expert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:54:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Worthington</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/11/07/bringing-guantanamo-to-new-york/comment-page-1/#comment-51602</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Worthington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=6098#comment-51602</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting take on justice, Dr. Miner, but not one to which I subscribe. People are innocent until proven guilty, not presumed guilty until that guilt can be &quot;formally/judicially refuted,&quot; and this is the essence of the whole problem with the &quot;War on Terror&quot; detentions. Prisoners who were seized largely on a random basis, at a time when bounty payments were widespread, were regarded as guilty on capture, and then had to endure years of interrogations which, in many, if not most cases, did nothing more than build up supposed evidence to justify their detention, which, on examination, is not evidence at all. As the District Courts have demonstrated time and again while ruling on the prisoners&#039; habeas corpus petitions, the government relies to an unhealthy degree on untrustworthy informers within Guantanamo -- or on statements made by &quot;high-value detainees&quot; held in secret CIA prisons in dubious conditions, to say the least. I don&#039;t doubt that there are a handful of committed terrorists in Guantanamo, but nothing I have seen in all my research demonstrates that foot soldiers for the Taliban with anti-American sentiments should be regarded as terrorists who pose a mortal threat to the United States. Had they been held, after screening, as prisoners of war, in accordance with the Geneva Conventions, we could be having a different conversation, but that, sadly, never happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting take on justice, Dr. Miner, but not one to which I subscribe. People are innocent until proven guilty, not presumed guilty until that guilt can be &#8220;formally/judicially refuted,&#8221; and this is the essence of the whole problem with the &#8220;War on Terror&#8221; detentions. Prisoners who were seized largely on a random basis, at a time when bounty payments were widespread, were regarded as guilty on capture, and then had to endure years of interrogations which, in many, if not most cases, did nothing more than build up supposed evidence to justify their detention, which, on examination, is not evidence at all. As the District Courts have demonstrated time and again while ruling on the prisoners&#8217; habeas corpus petitions, the government relies to an unhealthy degree on untrustworthy informers within Guantanamo &#8212; or on statements made by &#8220;high-value detainees&#8221; held in secret CIA prisons in dubious conditions, to say the least. I don&#8217;t doubt that there are a handful of committed terrorists in Guantanamo, but nothing I have seen in all my research demonstrates that foot soldiers for the Taliban with anti-American sentiments should be regarded as terrorists who pose a mortal threat to the United States. Had they been held, after screening, as prisoners of war, in accordance with the Geneva Conventions, we could be having a different conversation, but that, sadly, never happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Earnest Miner</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/11/07/bringing-guantanamo-to-new-york/comment-page-1/#comment-51594</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Earnest Miner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=6098#comment-51594</guid>
		<description>Sir,

Your dedication to this cause is commendable. Concommitantly, your defense of terrorists exemplifies how Al Qaeda has convinced many world citizens who seek peace and justice (like you) to help them fight on their jihaddist behalf without you even realizing it. I hope you are able to see the light one day, my friend.

Those who have not spent time at GTMO, read the intelligence files entirely, studied the laws that govern war and civil society, and worked with these terrorists, please reserve all &quot;evidence&quot; of their innocence until such due dilligence is complete and until guilt is formally/judicially refuted. 

Respectfully,
Dr. Miner</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir,</p>
<p>Your dedication to this cause is commendable. Concommitantly, your defense of terrorists exemplifies how Al Qaeda has convinced many world citizens who seek peace and justice (like you) to help them fight on their jihaddist behalf without you even realizing it. I hope you are able to see the light one day, my friend.</p>
<p>Those who have not spent time at GTMO, read the intelligence files entirely, studied the laws that govern war and civil society, and worked with these terrorists, please reserve all &#8220;evidence&#8221; of their innocence until such due dilligence is complete and until guilt is formally/judicially refuted. </p>
<p>Respectfully,<br />
Dr. Miner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Evening with Andy Worthington: &#8220;Outside the Law: Stories from Guantanamo&#8221; &#171; Dandelion Salad</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/11/07/bringing-guantanamo-to-new-york/comment-page-1/#comment-51411</link>
		<dc:creator>An Evening with Andy Worthington: &#8220;Outside the Law: Stories from Guantanamo&#8221; &#171; Dandelion Salad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 22:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=6098#comment-51411</guid>
		<description>[...] (co-directed with filmmaker Polly Nash), I traveled on Sunday (after events in New York, discussed here) to Fairfax, Virginia, for a screening of the film at an event organized by the Future of Freedom [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (co-directed with filmmaker Polly Nash), I traveled on Sunday (after events in New York, discussed here) to Fairfax, Virginia, for a screening of the film at an event organized by the Future of Freedom [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How we treat terror suspects is the sign of a true democracy &#124; Antony Loewenstein</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/11/07/bringing-guantanamo-to-new-york/comment-page-1/#comment-51396</link>
		<dc:creator>How we treat terror suspects is the sign of a true democracy &#124; Antony Loewenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=6098#comment-51396</guid>
		<description>[...] Worthington is currently in the US promoting his film, Outside the Law: Stories from Guantanamo. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Worthington is currently in the US promoting his film, Outside the Law: Stories from Guantanamo. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

