<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Drops Plan For New “Indefinite Detention” Policy At Guantánamo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/09/28/obama-drops-plan-for-new-indefinite-detention-policy-at-guantanamo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/09/28/obama-drops-plan-for-new-indefinite-detention-policy-at-guantanamo/</link>
	<description>Investigative journalist, author, filmmaker and Guantanamo expert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:40:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serious Problems With Obama’s Plan To Move Guantánamo To Illinois by Andy Worthington &#171; Dandelion Salad</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/09/28/obama-drops-plan-for-new-indefinite-detention-policy-at-guantanamo/comment-page-1/#comment-79889</link>
		<dc:creator>Serious Problems With Obama’s Plan To Move Guantánamo To Illinois by Andy Worthington &#171; Dandelion Salad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 23:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=5638#comment-79889</guid>
		<description>[...] proud of its plans to hold some prisoners indefinitely without charge or trial, which has been mentioned with alarming regularity since that speech at the National Archives in May, senior officials have generally been reluctant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] proud of its plans to hold some prisoners indefinitely without charge or trial, which has been mentioned with alarming regularity since that speech at the National Archives in May, senior officials have generally been reluctant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judge Confirms That an Innocent Man Was Tortured to Make False Confessions &#124; themcglynn.com/theliberal.net</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/09/28/obama-drops-plan-for-new-indefinite-detention-policy-at-guantanamo/comment-page-1/#comment-53905</link>
		<dc:creator>Judge Confirms That an Innocent Man Was Tortured to Make False Confessions &#124; themcglynn.com/theliberal.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 17:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=5638#comment-53905</guid>
		<description>[...] of false allegations followed by torture and false confessions may be detected, it troubles me that the 50 or so prisoners identified by officials last week as being candidates for indefinite detention &#8212; described by the New [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of false allegations followed by torture and false confessions may be detected, it troubles me that the 50 or so prisoners identified by officials last week as being candidates for indefinite detention &#8212; described by the New [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 116 Guantánamo Prisoners Cleared For Release; 171 Still In Limbo &#171; freedetainees.org</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/09/28/obama-drops-plan-for-new-indefinite-detention-policy-at-guantanamo/comment-page-1/#comment-52451</link>
		<dc:creator>116 Guantánamo Prisoners Cleared For Release; 171 Still In Limbo &#171; freedetainees.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 03:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=5638#comment-52451</guid>
		<description>[...] because existing legislation already allowed the administration to hold prisoners indefinitely. As I explained at the time: In dropping plans for new legislation … the administration has realized that it can continue to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] because existing legislation already allowed the administration to hold prisoners indefinitely. As I explained at the time: In dropping plans for new legislation … the administration has realized that it can continue to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama wins 2009 Nobel Peace Prize + OK, He’s A Nice Guy, But … by Andy Worthington &#171; Dandelion Salad</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/09/28/obama-drops-plan-for-new-indefinite-detention-policy-at-guantanamo/comment-page-1/#comment-50364</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama wins 2009 Nobel Peace Prize + OK, He’s A Nice Guy, But … by Andy Worthington &#171; Dandelion Salad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 20:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=5638#comment-50364</guid>
		<description>[...] and also that it “became a symbol that helped al-Qaeda recruit terrorists to its cause,” endorses indefinite detention without charge or trial for some of the 221 prisoners still held in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and also that it “became a symbol that helped al-Qaeda recruit terrorists to its cause,” endorses indefinite detention without charge or trial for some of the 221 prisoners still held in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Worthington Discusses Guantánamo And Bagram On Antiwar Radio &#171; Dandelion Salad</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/09/28/obama-drops-plan-for-new-indefinite-detention-policy-at-guantanamo/comment-page-1/#comment-50211</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Worthington Discusses Guantánamo And Bagram On Antiwar Radio &#171; Dandelion Salad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 01:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=5638#comment-50211</guid>
		<description>[...] In our tenth outing, Scott and I ran though some recent history: the administration’s decision not to push for new legislation authorizing the indefinite detention of prisoners in Guantánamo (and why it’s only a slight [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In our tenth outing, Scott and I ran though some recent history: the administration’s decision not to push for new legislation authorizing the indefinite detention of prisoners in Guantánamo (and why it’s only a slight [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

