<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Military Commissions: Government Flounders, As Admiral Hutson Nails Problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/07/08/military-commissions-government-flounders-as-admiral-hutson-nails-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/07/08/military-commissions-government-flounders-as-admiral-hutson-nails-problems/</link>
	<description>Author &#38; journalist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 18:43:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rep. Jerrold Nadler and David Frakt on Obama’s Three-Tier Justice System For Guantánamo by Andy Worthington &#171; Dandelion Salad</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/07/08/military-commissions-government-flounders-as-admiral-hutson-nails-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-51690</link>
		<dc:creator>Rep. Jerrold Nadler and David Frakt on Obama’s Three-Tier Justice System For Guantánamo by Andy Worthington &#171; Dandelion Salad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 07:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=4877#comment-51690</guid>
		<description>[...] ‘A Catastrophic Failure,’” which followed articles dealing with similar testimony by retired Adm. John Hutson and by Lt. Col. Darrel Vandeveld, a former prosecutor in the Commissions, who resigned when he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ‘A Catastrophic Failure,’” which followed articles dealing with similar testimony by retired Adm. John Hutson and by Lt. Col. Darrel Vandeveld, a former prosecutor in the Commissions, who resigned when he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Logic of the 9/11 Trials, The Madness of the Military Commissions &#171; Dandelion Salad</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/07/08/military-commissions-government-flounders-as-admiral-hutson-nails-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-51570</link>
		<dc:creator>The Logic of the 9/11 Trials, The Madness of the Military Commissions &#171; Dandelion Salad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=4877#comment-51570</guid>
		<description>[...] be fair and that convictions obtained will be secure,” he neglected to mention that, this summer, senior administration officials conceded that the proposed charge of material support for terrorism — a longtime mainstay of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be fair and that convictions obtained will be secure,” he neglected to mention that, this summer, senior administration officials conceded that the proposed charge of material support for terrorism — a longtime mainstay of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Worthington</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/07/08/military-commissions-government-flounders-as-admiral-hutson-nails-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-44936</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Worthington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=4877#comment-44936</guid>
		<description>Hi TD,
Thanks for highlighting the macho posturing of leaders who never served. We had a great example of that in the UK -- thank you, Tony Blair! -- and your comments are even more apposite when these leaders&#039; motivations are contrasted with those of serving officers who not only fought in the military, but also worked in the Commission system, and saw first-hand how despicable the entire system was.
See Lt. Col. Darrel Vandeveld&#039;s compelling testimony to a House Committee the day after Hutson:
http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/07/11/former-insider-shatters-credibility-of-military-commissions/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi TD,<br />
Thanks for highlighting the macho posturing of leaders who never served. We had a great example of that in the UK &#8212; thank you, Tony Blair! &#8212; and your comments are even more apposite when these leaders&#8217; motivations are contrasted with those of serving officers who not only fought in the military, but also worked in the Commission system, and saw first-hand how despicable the entire system was.<br />
See Lt. Col. Darrel Vandeveld&#8217;s compelling testimony to a House Committee the day after Hutson:<br />
<a href="http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/07/11/former-insider-shatters-credibility-of-military-commissions/" rel="nofollow">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/07/11/former-insider-shatters-credibility-of-military-commissions/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Former Insider Shatters Credibility of Military Commissions by Andy Worthington &#171; Dandelion Salad</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/07/08/military-commissions-government-flounders-as-admiral-hutson-nails-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-44834</link>
		<dc:creator>Former Insider Shatters Credibility of Military Commissions by Andy Worthington &#171; Dandelion Salad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=4877#comment-44834</guid>
		<description>[...] Wednesday, I reported how Retired Rear Admiral John D. Hutson, the former Judge Advocate General of the US Navy from 1997 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Wednesday, I reported how Retired Rear Admiral John D. Hutson, the former Judge Advocate General of the US Navy from 1997 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the talking dog</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/07/08/military-commissions-government-flounders-as-admiral-hutson-nails-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-44667</link>
		<dc:creator>the talking dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=4877#comment-44667</guid>
		<description>And so here we go again; a Democratic President &lt;i&gt;who himself never served in the military&lt;/i&gt; (because [John Kerry] Democrats who actually &lt;i&gt;did&lt;/i&gt; [Al Gore] serve in the military, if not serve heroically  [George McGovern] can&#039;t seem to get themselves elected (or in the case of career Naval officer Jimmy Carter, anyway, &lt;i&gt;re&lt;/i&gt;-elected), and so, have to try to show the &lt;i&gt;bona fides&lt;/i&gt; of &quot;their toughness&quot; by overdoing the John Wayne  macho bit  (btw, the late Mr. Wayne himself http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wayne  apparently didn&#039;t put his own money where his mouth was when it came to performing his own military service, though like the sainted Ronald Reagan, was, at least, a great military hero on celluloid).

And so... here we go again.  DOD&#039;s new G.C. Mr. Johnson (who himself, although counsel to the U.S. Air Force service in the past, has  not, to my knowledge, himself  donned the uniform http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeh_Johnson ) must carry the water of his more famous colleague the President (though the President was in my college class, he is about a year or so older than I; we were both fortunate enough to have been too young to be subject to the Vietnam era draft, though I was in one of the first groups after the Nixon-era banning of the draft to have to register for it under Carter&#039;s &quot;just to be safe&quot; scheme).    

I don&#039;t fault anyone for not serving in the military (and would be remiss in doing so, having not served myself), and indeed, I do look on admiringly to anyone who has so served.   My point is simply that it is about time that so-called liberals (as if!) stopped having to pretend that they are &quot;tougher than thou&quot; in innumerable ways... such as, of course, Barack Obama dusting off the Cheney-Addington playbook for &quot;military commissions&quot; &lt;i&gt;when he himself campaigned against them.&lt;/i&gt;  

This particular commission issue is free to the Obama Administration: stand your ground and either release the wrongly held prisoners, or bring them to trial in American federal courts.  If &quot;terrorists&quot; end up acquitted after &lt;i&gt;fair&lt;/i&gt; proceedings, the fault lies &lt;i&gt;with the Bush Administration for failing to adequately prepare these cases of purported &quot;war criminals&quot; without torture, hearsay and/or innuendo in lieu of facts&lt;/i&gt;.  As Glenn Greenwald notes, http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/07/09/guantanamo/index.html  
given how easily &quot;material support&quot; crimes can be proven (and given the extremely high conviction rate in federal courts in terrorism cases, as noted above), this should be a no-brainer.

But it seems, a no-brainer with even possible acquittals isn&#039;t good enough.  This insistence on preserving the prerogatives of executive power with such gimcracks as &quot;the military commissions&quot; is not at all why I supported Barack Obama&#039;s candidacy.  

And why if it keeps up, he&#039;ll lose my support going forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And so here we go again; a Democratic President <i>who himself never served in the military</i> (because [John Kerry] Democrats who actually <i>did</i> [Al Gore] serve in the military, if not serve heroically  [George McGovern] can&#8217;t seem to get themselves elected (or in the case of career Naval officer Jimmy Carter, anyway, <i>re</i>-elected), and so, have to try to show the <i>bona fides</i> of &#8220;their toughness&#8221; by overdoing the John Wayne  macho bit  (btw, the late Mr. Wayne himself <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wayne" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wayne?referer=');">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wayne</a>  apparently didn&#8217;t put his own money where his mouth was when it came to performing his own military service, though like the sainted Ronald Reagan, was, at least, a great military hero on celluloid).</p>
<p>And so&#8230; here we go again.  DOD&#8217;s new G.C. Mr. Johnson (who himself, although counsel to the U.S. Air Force service in the past, has  not, to my knowledge, himself  donned the uniform <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeh_Johnson" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeh_Johnson?referer=');">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeh_Johnson</a> ) must carry the water of his more famous colleague the President (though the President was in my college class, he is about a year or so older than I; we were both fortunate enough to have been too young to be subject to the Vietnam era draft, though I was in one of the first groups after the Nixon-era banning of the draft to have to register for it under Carter&#8217;s &#8220;just to be safe&#8221; scheme).    </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t fault anyone for not serving in the military (and would be remiss in doing so, having not served myself), and indeed, I do look on admiringly to anyone who has so served.   My point is simply that it is about time that so-called liberals (as if!) stopped having to pretend that they are &#8220;tougher than thou&#8221; in innumerable ways&#8230; such as, of course, Barack Obama dusting off the Cheney-Addington playbook for &#8220;military commissions&#8221; <i>when he himself campaigned against them.</i>  </p>
<p>This particular commission issue is free to the Obama Administration: stand your ground and either release the wrongly held prisoners, or bring them to trial in American federal courts.  If &#8220;terrorists&#8221; end up acquitted after <i>fair</i> proceedings, the fault lies <i>with the Bush Administration for failing to adequately prepare these cases of purported &#8220;war criminals&#8221; without torture, hearsay and/or innuendo in lieu of facts</i>.  As Glenn Greenwald notes, <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/07/09/guantanamo/index.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/07/09/guantanamo/index.html?referer=');">http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/07/09/guantanamo/index.html</a><br />
given how easily &#8220;material support&#8221; crimes can be proven (and given the extremely high conviction rate in federal courts in terrorism cases, as noted above), this should be a no-brainer.</p>
<p>But it seems, a no-brainer with even possible acquittals isn&#8217;t good enough.  This insistence on preserving the prerogatives of executive power with such gimcracks as &#8220;the military commissions&#8221; is not at all why I supported Barack Obama&#8217;s candidacy.  </p>
<p>And why if it keeps up, he&#8217;ll lose my support going forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Military Commissions: Government Flounders, As Admiral Hutson Nails Problems by Andy Worthington &#171; Dandelion Salad</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/07/08/military-commissions-government-flounders-as-admiral-hutson-nails-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-44436</link>
		<dc:creator>Military Commissions: Government Flounders, As Admiral Hutson Nails Problems by Andy Worthington &#171; Dandelion Salad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 00:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=4877#comment-44436</guid>
		<description>[...] by Andy Worthington Featured Writer Dandelion Salad www.andyworthington.co.uk 8 July 2009 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by Andy Worthington Featured Writer Dandelion Salad <a href="http://www.andyworthington.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk</a> 8 July 2009 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
