<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Britain’s Torture Troubles: What Tony Blair Knew</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/06/18/britains-torture-troubles-what-tony-blair-knew/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/06/18/britains-torture-troubles-what-tony-blair-knew/</link>
	<description>Investigative journalist, author, filmmaker and Guantanamo expert</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:54:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Worthington</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/06/18/britains-torture-troubles-what-tony-blair-knew/comment-page-1/#comment-39902</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Worthington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=3500#comment-39902</guid>
		<description>Hi Matthias,
Good to hear from you, and thanks for stressing the perils for us all of the &quot;operational&quot; use of torture. You&#039;re quite right, of course, as Lord Brown&#039;s opinion demonstrates so chillingly. We still have a long way to go ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matthias,<br />
Good to hear from you, and thanks for stressing the perils for us all of the &#8220;operational&#8221; use of torture. You&#8217;re quite right, of course, as Lord Brown&#8217;s opinion demonstrates so chillingly. We still have a long way to go &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathias</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/06/18/britains-torture-troubles-what-tony-blair-knew/comment-page-1/#comment-39901</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=3500#comment-39901</guid>
		<description>By the way, it&#039;s &#039;the Special Rapporteur on the protection of human rights while countering terrorism&#039; - you have quite a lot of human rights rapporteurs in the UN system ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, it&#8217;s &#8216;the Special Rapporteur on the protection of human rights while countering terrorism&#8217; &#8211; you have quite a lot of human rights rapporteurs in the UN system <img src='http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathias</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2009/06/18/britains-torture-troubles-what-tony-blair-knew/comment-page-1/#comment-39899</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=3500#comment-39899</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, the biggest problem is NOT about using such intelligence in the courtroom, but their &#039;operational&#039; use  (see also Milliband&#039;s comments of a couple of days ago). In the same 2005 judgment you quote, there&#039;s also Lord Brown saying:
&quot;Generally speaking it is accepted that the executive may make use of all information it acquires: both coerced statements and whatever fruits they are found to bear. Not merely, indeed, is the executive entitled to make use of this information; to my mind it is bound to do so. It has a prime responsibility to safeguard the security of the state.&quot;

THIS is the biggest problem of current counter-terrorism policies in the world.

One more thing: we haven&#039;t seen the last page yet in the history of the UK&#039;s involvement between 2002 and 2005 in the war on terror.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, the biggest problem is NOT about using such intelligence in the courtroom, but their &#8216;operational&#8217; use  (see also Milliband&#8217;s comments of a couple of days ago). In the same 2005 judgment you quote, there&#8217;s also Lord Brown saying:<br />
&#8220;Generally speaking it is accepted that the executive may make use of all information it acquires: both coerced statements and whatever fruits they are found to bear. Not merely, indeed, is the executive entitled to make use of this information; to my mind it is bound to do so. It has a prime responsibility to safeguard the security of the state.&#8221;</p>
<p>THIS is the biggest problem of current counter-terrorism policies in the world.</p>
<p>One more thing: we haven&#8217;t seen the last page yet in the history of the UK&#8217;s involvement between 2002 and 2005 in the war on terror&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

