Comments on: The Supreme Court’s Guantánamo ruling: what does it mean?

By: A Tired Obsession with Military Detention Plagues American Politics « Dandelion Salad

Mon, 09 Jan 2012 04:09:12 +0000

[...] Act of 2006 (PDF), and the Supreme Court had to revisit the prisoners’ cases in June 2008, in Boumediene v. Bush, reiterating that they had habeas corpus rights, and that those rights were constitutionally [...]

By: A Tired Obsession with Military Detention Plagues American Politics « Piazza della Carina

Sun, 08 Jan 2012 14:22:50 +0000

By: Kidnapping Victims Released | Lew Rockwell

Kidnapping Victims Released | Lew Rockwell — Fri, 09 Dec 2011 03:02:32 +0000

[...] It was not until June this year, when the Supreme Court revisited the prisoners' rights, and ruled that their habeas rights were constitutional, that the cases of the Bosnian Algerians – and [...]

By: The Black Hole of Guantánamo: The Sad Story of Ravil Mingazov « freedetainees.org

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 02:02:49 +0000

[...] He remains in Guantánamo more than three years after the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Boumediene v. Bush extending the writ of habeas corpus to Guantánamo detainees and giving the lower courts great [...]

By: Guantánamo And The Death Of Habeas Corpus - OpEd

Guantánamo And The Death Of Habeas Corpus - OpEd — Fri, 29 Jul 2011 06:54:14 +0000

[...] 'wpp-261'; var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true};Last month, the third anniversary of Boumediene v. Bush (on June 12) passed without mention. This was a great shame, not only because it was a powerful [...]

By: How The US Supreme Court Gave Up On Guantánamo – OpEd « Eurasia Review

Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:12:42 +0000

[...] the judicial front, the Supreme Court has ducked Guantánamo since its last major intervention, in Boumediene v. Bush, in June 2008, when the justices ruled that the prisoners had constitutionally guaranteed habeas [...]

By: Habeas Hell: How The Great Writ Was Gutted At Guantánamo « Eurasia Review

Habeas Hell: How The Great Writ Was Gutted At Guantánamo « Eurasia Review — Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:47:14 +0000

[...] until June 2008, in Boumediene v. Bush (PDF), when, revisiting the prisoners’ circumstances, the Supreme Court ruled that the habeas-stripping provisions in the DTA and the MCA were unconstitutional, and granted the [...]

By: Guantánamo Prisoner Dies After Being Held for Nine Years Without Charge or Trial | The Muslim Justice Initiative

Sun, 06 Feb 2011 15:35:06 +0000

[...] of a judicial ruling, despite the fact that he, along with all the Guantánamo prisoners, had been granted habeas corpus rights by the US Supreme Court two years and eight months [...]

By: By One Vote, US Court OKs Torture and “Extraordinary Rendition” « Dandelion Salad

Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:09:21 +0000

[...] as I also explained: [T]he judges drew on Boumediene [v. Bush, the 2008 ruling granting the Guantánamo prisoners constitutionally guaranteed habeas [...]

By: Gonzalo Gato Villegas » Blog Archive » ¿Sabe realmente Obama, le preocupa acaso, quién sigue en Guantánamo?

Thu, 17 Jun 2010 11:12:46 +0000

[...] 2008, fueron los primeros hombres en conseguir sus peticiones de habeas corpus después de que el Tribunal Supremo dictaminara tres meses antes que los prisioneros de Guantánamo tenían constitucionalmente derecho [...]