Comments on: The Supreme Court’s Guantánamo ruling: what does it mean?

By: Update on Guantanamo Detainees’ Habeas Corpus Challenges - National Security Law Brief

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:06:59 +0000

[...] an update on the effects of a U.S. Supreme Court 2008 ruling, which allowed Guantanamo detainees ”the right to challenge their [...]

By: LT Saloon | Rubbing Salt in Guantanamo’s Wounds: Task Force Announces Indefinite Detentions

Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:10:09 +0000

[...] This is a welcome acknowledgment, as the courts’ role, mandated by an enormously significant Supreme Court ruling in June 2008, has been noticeably sidelined by the administration, even though, in the last 16 [...]

By: Bagram: Graveyard of the Geneva Conventions « Dandelion Salad

Bagram: Graveyard of the Geneva Conventions « Dandelion Salad — Sat, 06 Feb 2010 01:11:29 +0000

[...] the one-sided review process convened in 2004-05, which the Supreme Court found inadequate in Boumediene v. Bush, the June 2008 ruling granting the prisoners constitutionally guaranteed habeas corpus [...]

By: Andy Worthington: Swiss Take Two Guantanamo Uighurs, Solve Obama’s Problem

Andy Worthington: Swiss Take Two Guantanamo Uighurs, Solve Obama’s Problem — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:52:08 +0000

[...] to wait until October 2008, when Judge Ricardo Urbina, a U.S. District Court judge, ruled on their long-delayed habeas corpus petitions, and ordered their release into the United States, because no other country had been found that [...]

By: Rubbing Salt in Guantanamo’s Wounds: Task Force Announces Indefinite Detentions | themcglynn.com/theliberal.net

Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:03:49 +0000

By: Dark Revelations in the Bagram Prisoner List « freedetainees.org

Dark Revelations in the Bagram Prisoner List « freedetainees.org — Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:42:13 +0000

[...] writ of habeas corpus, granted to the prisoners at Guantánamo by the Supreme Court in June 2008 (in Boumediene v. Bush), extended to foreign prisoners seized in other countries and rendered to Bagram, because [...]

By: Happy 8th Birthday Gitmo: an interview with watchdog Andy Worthington « Pluto Press – Independent Progressive Publishing

Tue, 19 Jan 2010 16:34:37 +0000

[...] habeas petitions, and to bring their stories of torture and abuse to the world. That process was derailed by Congress for another four years (although the administration failed to keep the lawyers out), but no lawyer [...]

By: Serious Problems With Obama’s Plan To Move Guantánamo To Illinois by Andy Worthington « Dandelion Salad

Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:49:01 +0000

[...] almost as an afterthought, was the following passage: “In addition, the Supreme Court ruled in Boumediene v. Bush [in June 2008] that all detainees currently held at Guantánamo have the right to file petitions [...]

By: “Model Prisoner” at Guantánamo, Tortured in the “Dark Prison,” Loses Habeas Corpus Petition « freedetainees.org

Wed, 16 Dec 2009 06:24:45 +0000

[...] case in modern history and Guantánamo and the Supreme Court: What Happened? (both December 2007), The Supreme Court’s Guantánamo ruling: what does it mean? (June 2008), Guantánamo as Alice in Wonderland (Uighurs’ first court victory, June 2008), [...]

By: 116 Guantánamo Prisoners Cleared For Release; 171 Still In Limbo by Andy Worthington « Dandelion Salad

Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:33:48 +0000

[...] June 2008, when the Supreme Court granted the prisoners constitutionally guaranteed habeas corpus rights, District Court judges have been examining the government’s evidence and, in 31 of the 39 cases [...]