<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Britain’s Guantánamo: control orders renewed, as one suspect is freed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2008/02/23/britains-guantanamo-control-orders-renewed-as-one-suspect-is-freed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2008/02/23/britains-guantanamo-control-orders-renewed-as-one-suspect-is-freed/</link>
	<description>Author &#38; journalist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:34:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2008/02/23/britains-guantanamo-control-orders-renewed-as-one-suspect-is-freed/comment-page-1/#comment-31899</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 17:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=234#comment-31899</guid>
		<description>I believe that Control Orders are served on those who &#039;know too much&#039; and whose personal stories would thwart the &#039;official line&#039; of the &#039;(War of) Terrorism&#039; that we hear about.  Look at the amount of &#039;closed session&#039; evidence that features in the cases of those appealing their control orders.

I believe the latest Control Order served was on 10th January 2008 upon Respondent &#039;AP&#039; who is Elias Girma Eyassu aka Jeffrey/Geoffrey Obwana/Obwona/Obonwa/Obwona (see case notes here: http://preview.tinyurl.com/dxzjjv )

Elias Girma Eyassu was present at the alleged &#039;terror training camp&#039; in the Lake District in May 2004 where a number of the accused July 21st &#039;bombers&#039; were present - all under Special Branch surveillance (Operation Ragstone, referred to in the JCdM inquest).

I believe that Control Orders are being used to hush up the machinations of the UK Secret Service/Special Branch complicity with/facilitation of terrorist plots, played out by hapless patsies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that Control Orders are served on those who &#8216;know too much&#8217; and whose personal stories would thwart the &#8216;official line&#8217; of the &#8216;(War of) Terrorism&#8217; that we hear about.  Look at the amount of &#8216;closed session&#8217; evidence that features in the cases of those appealing their control orders.</p>
<p>I believe the latest Control Order served was on 10th January 2008 upon Respondent &#8216;AP&#8217; who is Elias Girma Eyassu aka Jeffrey/Geoffrey Obwana/Obwona/Obonwa/Obwona (see case notes here: <a href="http://preview.tinyurl.com/dxzjjv" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/preview.tinyurl.com/dxzjjv?referer=');">http://preview.tinyurl.com/dxzjjv</a> )</p>
<p>Elias Girma Eyassu was present at the alleged &#8216;terror training camp&#8217; in the Lake District in May 2004 where a number of the accused July 21st &#8216;bombers&#8217; were present &#8211; all under Special Branch surveillance (Operation Ragstone, referred to in the JCdM inquest).</p>
<p>I believe that Control Orders are being used to hush up the machinations of the UK Secret Service/Special Branch complicity with/facilitation of terrorist plots, played out by hapless patsies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Worthington</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2008/02/23/britains-guantanamo-control-orders-renewed-as-one-suspect-is-freed/comment-page-1/#comment-15562</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Worthington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=234#comment-15562</guid>
		<description>The following message came from Marilyn Shepherd in Australia:

Andy your work is greatly appreciated in Australia as we had two people in Gitmo who were not guilty of anything at all.
To put the Howard days in perspective look at this case:
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/HCA/2004/37.html?query=al%20kateb  
Lifetime detention for people they knew were always entirely innocent.

After I replied to Marilyn, asking for permission to post her comments here, she replied: 

Please do Andy, the more of the world who knows what we are up to the better as the media are still demonising Hicks here in Australia even though he didn&#039;t do anything worse than spend over 5 years being tortured by the US.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following message came from Marilyn Shepherd in Australia:</p>
<p>Andy your work is greatly appreciated in Australia as we had two people in Gitmo who were not guilty of anything at all.<br />
To put the Howard days in perspective look at this case:<br />
<a href="http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/HCA/2004/37.html?query=al%20kateb" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/HCA/2004/37.html?query=al_20kateb&amp;referer=');">http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/HCA/2004/37.html?query=al%20kateb</a><br />
Lifetime detention for people they knew were always entirely innocent.</p>
<p>After I replied to Marilyn, asking for permission to post her comments here, she replied: </p>
<p>Please do Andy, the more of the world who knows what we are up to the better as the media are still demonising Hicks here in Australia even though he didn&#8217;t do anything worse than spend over 5 years being tortured by the US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ephems of BLB</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2008/02/23/britains-guantanamo-control-orders-renewed-as-one-suspect-is-freed/comment-page-1/#comment-15486</link>
		<dc:creator>Ephems of BLB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=234#comment-15486</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Control orders law renewed, jail without charge up to 42 days demanded: shame!&lt;/strong&gt;

The iniquitous control orders régime has been renewed for another year, one day before another control order is quashed as unjustified by the high court; and the government continues to demand the extension to 42 days of the maximum time allowed for s...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Control orders law renewed, jail without charge up to 42 days demanded: shame!</strong></p>
<p>The iniquitous control orders régime has been renewed for another year, one day before another control order is quashed as unjustified by the high court; and the government continues to demand the extension to 42 days of the maximum time allowed for s&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Worthington</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2008/02/23/britains-guantanamo-control-orders-renewed-as-one-suspect-is-freed/comment-page-1/#comment-15477</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Worthington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=234#comment-15477</guid>
		<description>Channel 4 (via ITN) has more details, which demonstrate the ruinous effects of the control order on Mr. Bullivant’s life:

Lawyers for Bullivant, from Dagenham, Essex, had argued the accusations were “baseless”, and that he was the victim of an abuse of power. Bullivant said the order had taken him down to “the depths of despair”.

The quashed order was made last year and replaced the original ruling made in June 2006. The judge said that, on the material now available, he would not have upheld the first order either, but he was satisfied that the Home Secretary had reasonable grounds for suspicion and was justified in making it at the time. The judge was told that Jacqui Smith was not going to appeal against his ruling, and Mr Bullivant&#039;s solicitor, Henry Miller, said he was now “absolutely a free man”.

Mr Bullivant said outside court that his marriage was wrecked by the control order and his mental health had suffered seriously. He now intends to take up the nursing course that, he said, he had to abandon because of the tough restrictions under the order. He said in a statement: “Since the imposition of the first control order in June 2006, I have been subjected to the most extreme pressures which have thrown my life into turmoil. As a direct result of the imposition of the order, my wife has left me and my family and friends have become deeply distressed. The Home Office&#039;s own psychiatrist has confirmed that I am now suffering from severe depressive illness which was caused by the imposition of the control order. Although I am very happy that this order has now been lifted, this draconian process and legislation is still continuing to ruin the lives of others and their families.”

http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/uk/british+muslims+control+order+quashed/1628147</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Channel 4 (via ITN) has more details, which demonstrate the ruinous effects of the control order on Mr. Bullivant’s life:</p>
<p>Lawyers for Bullivant, from Dagenham, Essex, had argued the accusations were “baseless”, and that he was the victim of an abuse of power. Bullivant said the order had taken him down to “the depths of despair”.</p>
<p>The quashed order was made last year and replaced the original ruling made in June 2006. The judge said that, on the material now available, he would not have upheld the first order either, but he was satisfied that the Home Secretary had reasonable grounds for suspicion and was justified in making it at the time. The judge was told that Jacqui Smith was not going to appeal against his ruling, and Mr Bullivant&#8217;s solicitor, Henry Miller, said he was now “absolutely a free man”.</p>
<p>Mr Bullivant said outside court that his marriage was wrecked by the control order and his mental health had suffered seriously. He now intends to take up the nursing course that, he said, he had to abandon because of the tough restrictions under the order. He said in a statement: “Since the imposition of the first control order in June 2006, I have been subjected to the most extreme pressures which have thrown my life into turmoil. As a direct result of the imposition of the order, my wife has left me and my family and friends have become deeply distressed. The Home Office&#8217;s own psychiatrist has confirmed that I am now suffering from severe depressive illness which was caused by the imposition of the control order. Although I am very happy that this order has now been lifted, this draconian process and legislation is still continuing to ruin the lives of others and their families.”</p>
<p><a href="http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/uk/british+muslims+control+order+quashed/1628147" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.channel4.com/news/articles/uk/british+muslims+control+order+quashed/1628147?referer=');">http://www.channel4.com/news/articles/uk/british+muslims+control+order+quashed/1628147</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Worthington</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2008/02/23/britains-guantanamo-control-orders-renewed-as-one-suspect-is-freed/comment-page-1/#comment-15476</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Worthington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=234#comment-15476</guid>
		<description>After this article was published, I received the following comment. The link is well worth checking out.

Hi Andy,
Our website al-istiqamah.com recently did an interview with Mouloud Sihali which concentrates on the psychological effects of control orders. You might find it of interest:
http://al-istiqamah.com/IF/Sihali1.htm
Best regards,
Al-istiqamah.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After this article was published, I received the following comment. The link is well worth checking out.</p>
<p>Hi Andy,<br />
Our website al-istiqamah.com recently did an interview with Mouloud Sihali which concentrates on the psychological effects of control orders. You might find it of interest:<br />
<a href="http://al-istiqamah.com/IF/Sihali1.htm" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/al-istiqamah.com/IF/Sihali1.htm?referer=');">http://al-istiqamah.com/IF/Sihali1.htm</a><br />
Best regards,<br />
Al-istiqamah.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eleanor Boyd</title>
		<link>http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2008/02/23/britains-guantanamo-control-orders-renewed-as-one-suspect-is-freed/comment-page-1/#comment-15469</link>
		<dc:creator>Eleanor Boyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/?p=234#comment-15469</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I am very glad of the decision to free Mr Bullivant.  He should never have been subjected to imprisonment and subsequently a control order for simply having had the intention to board a plane to Syria.  No wonder he wasn&#039;t charged and taken to court.  You can just hear the government&#039;s &#039;evidence&#039; had they been forced to - &quot;We think that maybe possibly he was going to Syria to become a terrorist!&quot; - that kind of stuff thankfully would not stand up as evidence in a British court and long may this situation continue.  It is galling that the Conservatives joined with Labour to extend the life of these control orders as they do not belong in a democratic society where the laws of the land should apply to everyone, regardless of race, colour or creed and where strong evidence of wrong-doing is required to convict someone of a crime.  If someone cannot be convicted by a court of law, if evidence is so flimsy or so fake that it wouldn&#039;t stand up in a court of law, then they should not be punished in this dreadful way.  It is simply unacceptable to label people as possible terrorists and hope that the &#039;terrorist threat&#039; will stop the rest of us caring about them and their human rights.  I just cannot believe that I am living in a democracy when there are people who are under control orders without knowing exactly what it is that they are accused of and who are not allowed and whose solicitors are not allowed to see the &#039;evidence&#039; against them.  And it won&#039;t surprise me when the cases against the others are seen eventually to be as ridiculous as that against Mr Bullivant.  I wish this government would stop using the &#039;terrorist threat&#039; as an excuse to remove the human rights and civil liberties of people living in this country.  All totalitarian governments justify themselves in this way and this Labour Government is no different in my view.  There is no excuse for imposing control orders on anyone in a democratic society.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very glad of the decision to free Mr Bullivant.  He should never have been subjected to imprisonment and subsequently a control order for simply having had the intention to board a plane to Syria.  No wonder he wasn&#8217;t charged and taken to court.  You can just hear the government&#8217;s &#8216;evidence&#8217; had they been forced to &#8211; &#8220;We think that maybe possibly he was going to Syria to become a terrorist!&#8221; &#8211; that kind of stuff thankfully would not stand up as evidence in a British court and long may this situation continue.  It is galling that the Conservatives joined with Labour to extend the life of these control orders as they do not belong in a democratic society where the laws of the land should apply to everyone, regardless of race, colour or creed and where strong evidence of wrong-doing is required to convict someone of a crime.  If someone cannot be convicted by a court of law, if evidence is so flimsy or so fake that it wouldn&#8217;t stand up in a court of law, then they should not be punished in this dreadful way.  It is simply unacceptable to label people as possible terrorists and hope that the &#8216;terrorist threat&#8217; will stop the rest of us caring about them and their human rights.  I just cannot believe that I am living in a democracy when there are people who are under control orders without knowing exactly what it is that they are accused of and who are not allowed and whose solicitors are not allowed to see the &#8216;evidence&#8217; against them.  And it won&#8217;t surprise me when the cases against the others are seen eventually to be as ridiculous as that against Mr Bullivant.  I wish this government would stop using the &#8216;terrorist threat&#8217; as an excuse to remove the human rights and civil liberties of people living in this country.  All totalitarian governments justify themselves in this way and this Labour Government is no different in my view.  There is no excuse for imposing control orders on anyone in a democratic society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
